Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2025

Author Spotlight: Accelerating Diagnostic Accuracy with Direct Identification of Gram-Negatives from Blood Culture Bottles
Published on: May 24, 2024
Overprediction of Carbapenemase-Containing Isolates by an Automated AST Instrument's Computer Algorithm
Kathryn S Rice1, Paul M Luethy2
1Department of Pathology, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
The VITEK 2 and Advanced Expert System (AES) show low accuracy in detecting carbapenemases, with a positive predictive value of only 30.3%. These systems are better suited as screening tools for carbapenemase-producing organisms, not definitive diagnostic tests.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Antimicrobial Resistance
Background:
- The VITEK 2 system is widely used for predicting antibiotic resistance mechanisms.
- However, its reliability in detecting carbapenemases is questionable due to inconsistent research findings.
- Existing methods and results for carbapenemase prediction vary significantly.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical reliability of VITEK 2 and Advanced Expert System (AES) for carbapenemase detection.
- To compare VITEK 2 and AES predictions against a modified carbapenemase inactivation method.
- To assess the utility of these systems in a routine academic medical center laboratory workflow.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study was conducted in an academic medical center laboratory.
- VITEK 2 and AES predictions were compared with the modified carbapenemase inactivation method.
- The study focused on routine workflow for carbapenemase detection in a specific patient population.
Main Results:
- The positive predictive value for carbapenemase detection using VITEK 2 and AES was found to be 30.3% (91 out of 300 cases).
- This indicates a significant rate of false positives in identifying carbapenemase-producing organisms.
- The findings highlight limitations in the accuracy of these automated systems for definitive carbapenemase identification.
Conclusions:
- The VITEK 2 and AES are not reliable as definitive tests for carbapenemase detection.
- These systems should be utilized as a preliminary screening tool for carbapenemase-containing organisms.
- Further investigation and confirmatory testing are recommended for accurate diagnosis and patient management.
More Related Videos
11:25Preparation of a Blood Culture Pellet for Rapid Bacterial Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing
Published on: October 15, 2014
09:59Application of the Intelligent High-Throughput Antimicrobial Sensitivity Testing/Phage Screening System and Lar Index of Antimicrobial Resistance
Published on: July 21, 2023