Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2025

Closure of a Patent Foramen Ovale PFO: An Intervention Sequence
Published on: December 23, 2022
Association of Atrial Septal Aneurysm and Shunt Size With Stroke Recurrence and Benefit From Patent Foramen Ovale
Jean-Louis Mas1, Jeffrey L Saver2, Scott E Kasner3
1GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Service de Neurologie, Institut de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences de Paris, Université de Paris-Cité, Paris, France.
Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) closure significantly reduces recurrent stroke risk. The benefit is greatest for patients with large shunts and atrial septal aneurysms (ASA), highlighting the importance of these PFO features.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Neurology
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) is a potential cause of stroke.
- The PFO-Associated Stroke Causal Likelihood classification system uses patient and PFO features to predict treatment response.
- The specific impact of PFO shunt size and atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) on stroke recurrence after PFO closure needs further clarification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) closure and recurrent ischemic stroke.
- To evaluate how PFO shunt size and the presence of an atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) modify the effectiveness of PFO closure in preventing stroke recurrence.
Main Methods:
- Pooled individual patient data from 6 randomized clinical trials comparing PFO closure with medical therapy.
- Analysis included 3740 patients with PFO-associated stroke, stratified by PFO shunt size (small vs. large) and presence/absence of ASA.
- Recurrent ischemic stroke was the primary outcome, assessed over a median follow-up of 57 months.
Main Results:
- PFO closure significantly reduced the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke (aHR, 0.41).
- The benefit of PFO closure was significantly greater in patients with both a large shunt and an ASA (aHR, 0.15) compared to other subgroups.
- Patients with large shunt and ASA experienced a greater absolute risk reduction in recurrent stroke at 2 years (5.5%) compared to other categories (1.0%).
Conclusions:
- PFO closure is effective in reducing recurrent stroke, particularly in patients with specific PFO characteristics.
- A combination of large shunt size and the presence of an ASA identifies patients who derive the most substantial benefit from PFO closure.
- These findings can aid in shared decision-making between patients and clinicians regarding PFO closure treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management

