Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device01:30

Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device

159
Surveyors use Global Positioning System (GPS) technology to measure the precise location and elevation of points on Earth. In a recent survey, GPS receivers were used to determine the coordinates and elevations of two park monuments. The process involved careful mission planning, data collection, and correction to ensure accuracy. The survey began with mission planning to identify optimal satellite visibility and minimize Position Dilution of Precision (PDOP). A geodetic control point...
159
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

6.8K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
6.8K
Detection of Black Holes01:10

Detection of Black Holes

2.3K
Although black holes were theoretically postulated in the 1920s, they remained outside the domain of observational astronomy until the 1970s.
Their closest cousins are neutron stars, which are composed almost entirely of neutrons packed against each other, making them extremely dense. A neutron star has the same mass as the Sun but its diameter is only a few kilometers. Therefore, the escape velocity from their surface is close to the speed of light.
Not until the 1960s, when the first neutron...
2.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Titanium dioxide nanoparticles relieve biochemical dysfunctions of fifth-instar larvae of silkworms following exposure to phoxim insecticide.

Chemosphere·2012
Same author

Mechanisms of prostate atrophy after LHRH antagonist cetrorelix injection: an experimental study in a rat model of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban·2012
Same author

Simulation and experimental investigation of structural dynamic frequency characteristics control.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2012
Same author

Chronic clomipramine treatment restores hippocampal expression of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in a rat model of depression.

Journal of affective disorders·2012
Same author

Application of nanoLC-MS/MS to the shotgun proteomic analysis of the nematocyst proteins from jellyfish Stomolophus meleagris.

Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences·2012
Same author

Identification of Sare0718 as an alanine-activating adenylation domain in marine actinomycete Salinispora arenicola CNS-205.

PloS one·2012

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 26, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

612

Narrowing the Gap: Improved Detector Training With Noisy Location Annotations.

Shaoru Wang, Jin Gao, Bing Li

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing : a Publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society
    |October 10, 2022
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Noisy location annotations degrade deep learning object detection performance. A proposed self-correction technique using Bayesian filters mitigates this noise, improving model accuracy.

    More Related Videos

    Tracking Rats in Operant Conditioning Chambers Using a Versatile Homemade Video Camera and DeepLabCut
    08:32

    Tracking Rats in Operant Conditioning Chambers Using a Versatile Homemade Video Camera and DeepLabCut

    Published on: June 15, 2020

    12.7K
    Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment
    08:25

    Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment

    Published on: May 7, 2019

    9.1K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Aug 26, 2025

    Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
    03:31

    Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

    Published on: December 15, 2023

    612
    Tracking Rats in Operant Conditioning Chambers Using a Versatile Homemade Video Camera and DeepLabCut
    08:32

    Tracking Rats in Operant Conditioning Chambers Using a Versatile Homemade Video Camera and DeepLabCut

    Published on: June 15, 2020

    12.7K
    Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment
    08:25

    Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment

    Published on: May 7, 2019

    9.1K

    Area of Science:

    • Computer Vision
    • Machine Learning
    • Deep Learning

    Background:

    • Deep learning models, particularly for object detection, rely heavily on large, accurately annotated datasets.
    • Manual annotation, especially pixel-wise bounding boxes, is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and prone to human error, introducing noise.
    • Noisy annotations can significantly degrade the performance of object detection algorithms.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the impact of noisy location annotations on object detection performance.
    • To develop a method for reducing the adverse effects of noisy annotations on user-side.
    • To improve the robustness of object detection models against annotation inaccuracies.

    Main Methods:

    • Introduced synthesized noise into bounding box annotations to quantify performance degradation.
    • Proposed a self-correction technique utilizing a Bayesian filter for prediction ensembles.
    • Employed a Teacher-Student learning paradigm to leverage noisy annotations effectively.

    Main Results:

    • Significant performance drops were observed in both one-stage (e.g., FCOS) and two-stage (e.g., Faster R-CNN) detectors with noisy annotations.
    • Synthesized noise reduced FCOS performance from 38.9% AP to 33.6% AP and Faster R-CNN from 37.8% AP to 33.7% AP on the COCO dataset.
    • The proposed self-correction method successfully recovered degraded performance, increasing FCOS AP from 33.6% to 35.6%.

    Conclusions:

    • Noisy location annotations pose a substantial challenge to object detection model accuracy.
    • The developed self-correction technique effectively mitigates the negative impact of noisy annotations.
    • This approach offers a practical solution for improving object detection performance in real-world scenarios with imperfect data.