Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Increased human risk caused by cascading hazards - A framework
Shuai Zhang1, Bijiao Wang1, Limin Zhang2
1MOE Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
This study introduces a new framework to quantify human risk from cascading hazards. It accounts for hazard interactions and vulnerabilities, improving disaster preparedness and mitigating societal impacts.
Area of Science:
- Earth and Environmental Sciences
- Risk Assessment
- Disaster Management
Background:
- Cascading hazards, frequently occurring, pose significant risks due to amplified dangers.
- Existing risk assessment methods inadequately quantify human risks associated with cascading events.
- Failure to anticipate these amplified risks can lead to severe societal and environmental consequences.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose an improved framework for quantifying human risk from cascading hazards.
- To enhance the scientific anticipation and preparedness for intensified hazards.
- To address the limitations in current risk assessment methodologies for complex disaster scenarios.
Main Methods:
- Development of a novel framework integrating hazard interactions and element vulnerabilities.
- Quantitative analysis of human risk considering the chain effects of multiple hazards.
- Application of the framework to a case study involving seismic-induced cascading hazards.
Main Results:
- The proposed framework effectively quantifies human risk by considering inter-hazard and inter-vulnerability dynamics.
- The case study demonstrated the framework's utility in assessing risks from sequential hazards like landslides, debris flows, damming, and flooding.
- Improved quantification of human risk associated with cascading events.
Conclusions:
- The developed framework offers a more comprehensive approach to human risk assessment for cascading hazards.
- Enhanced preparedness and mitigation strategies can be formulated based on this improved risk quantification.
- The study highlights the critical need to address cascading effects in disaster risk management.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Hazard Rate
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Design Consideration
The factor of safety is another key...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response

