Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2025

07:30
Learning Modern Laryngeal Surgery in a Dissection Laboratory
Published on: March 18, 2020
8.2K
Narrow-field supracricoid partial laryngectomy: Procedure development and initial clinical experiences
Meijin Nakayama1, Takashi Wada1, Yasuhiro Isono1
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.
Auris, Nasus, Larynx
|October 10, 2022
Summary
Narrow-field supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy (NF-SCPL-CHEP) is a feasible and oncologically sound procedure for glottic cancers. This minimally invasive technique offers reduced hospital stays and predictable recovery compared to open surgery.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Surgical Oncology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
Background:
- Glottic cancers require effective surgical treatment.
- Supracricoid partial laryngectomy (SCPL) is a standard oncologic procedure.
- Minimally invasive approaches aim to reduce morbidity and improve outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of narrow-field supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy (NF-SCPL-CHEP).
- To compare the postoperative recovery and length of stay with historical open SCPL controls.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study of five patients with glottic cancers undergoing NF-SCPL-CHEP between 2019 and 2020.
- Evaluation of surgical drain, tracheostomy, and nasogastric tube duration.
- Comparison of hospitalization length with historical open SCPL data.
Main Results:
- All five patients had uneventful recoveries with no major complications.
- Mean durations for drains, tracheostomy, and NG tube were 2, 15, and 46 days, respectively.
- Mean hospitalization was 36 days for NF-SCPL-CHEP, half that of open SCPL (72 days).
- No local recurrences or distant metastases observed over a mean 39-month follow-up.
Conclusions:
- NF-SCPL-CHEP is technically feasible and oncologically sound for glottic cancers.
- The procedure offers reduced complications and predictable recovery.
- Shorter hospital stays and potential benefits from preserved local circulation are noted.
- Further multi-institutional studies are needed to confirm long-term outcomes.

