Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2025

A Closed-chest Model to Induce Transverse Aortic Constriction in Mice
Published on: April 5, 2018
Traumatic Injuries Following Mechanical versus Manual Chest Compression
Safwat Saleem1, Roman Sonkin2, Iftach Sagy3,4
1Emergency Department, Rabin Medical Center - Beilinson Hospital, Petach-Tikva, Israel.
Mechanical chest compression devices (ACD) did not increase skeletal fractures or internal injuries compared to manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. The LUCAS device showed no added benefit for return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Cardiology
- Resuscitation Science
Background:
- Survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is heavily influenced by chest compression quality.
- Studies comparing manual chest compressions with mechanical active compression-depression (ACD) devices have produced conflicting outcomes regarding efficacy and patient injury.
- The safety and effectiveness of ACD devices in OHCA require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of skeletal fractures and/or internal injuries between mechanical ACD devices and manual chest compressions in OHCA patients.
- To assess the association between ACD device use and the rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).
- To identify clinical factors influencing skeletal injury and ROSC achievement during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).
Main Methods:
- A cohort study included 107 OHCA patients who achieved ROSC at a tertiary medical center between January 2018 and June 2019.
- Patients were divided into two groups: manual chest compression (n=45) and mechanical ACD device (LUCAS) (n=62).
- Primary outcome was the incidence of skeletal fractures and/or internal injuries; secondary outcomes included ROSC rates and contributing clinical factors.
Main Results:
- Chest compression duration was similar between groups (46.0 min manual vs. 48.5 min ACD, p=0.82).
- No significant differences were observed in ROSC rates (53.2% vs. 50.8%, p=0.84), major complications (20.5% vs. 12.1%, p=0.28), or any complications.
- Multivariate analysis identified cardiac etiology (OR 1.94) and female sex (OR 1.94) as predictors of ROSC; LUCAS use was not associated with ROSC (OR 0.73).
Conclusions:
- This study is the first to directly compare mechanical and manual chest compressions of similar duration in OHCA patients achieving ROSC.
- The LUCAS ACD device did not demonstrate improved ROSC rates and was not associated with an increased risk of traumatic injury.
- ACD devices may offer benefits in specific scenarios, such as delayed emergency medical services response or remote resuscitation efforts.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Pneumothorax-II
Clinical Manifestations:
Flail Chest-I
Flail chest is a severe and potentially life-threatening condition characterized by the fracture of three or more adjacent ribs in multiple places. It is most commonly caused by direct impacts and trauma, such as motor vehicle accidents or injuries from a steering wheel impact. It can also occur due to falls in elderly individuals with osteoporosis, or assaults involving sharp objects.
Pathophysiology
The pathophysiology of flail chest is complex, involving fractures of...
Pneumothorax-I
Pneumothorax can be even further classified as spontaneous, traumatic, and tension pneumothorax.
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

