Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Pediatric Shared Decision-Making for Simple and Complex Decisions: Findings From a Delphi Panel
Sarah M Eaton1,2, Jonna D Clark3, Christy L Cummings4
1Institute of Biomedical Ethics.
Insights
This study developed 79 recommendations for pediatric shared decision-making (SDM) to personalize care for children and families. Key findings emphasize tailoring the decision process to individual needs and preferences for better outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric healthcare research
- Clinical decision-making
- Health services research
Background:
- Shared decision-making (SDM) is crucial in pediatric care.
- Developing evidence-based recommendations for pediatric SDM is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop comprehensive recommendations for pediatric shared decision-making (SDM).
- To differentiate recommendations for simple versus complex pediatric decisions.
Main Methods:
- A 2020-2021 Delphi study involved an international panel of 21 experts (clinicians, researchers, parents).
- Semistructured interviews and content analysis identified key SDM processes.
- A two-round Likert scale questionnaire assessed processes for simple and complex decisions.
Main Results:
- 79 recommendations were generated, comprising 29 fundamental and 14 additional processes for complex decisions.
- Personalization of the decision-making process emerged as a critical theme.
- Recommendations include assessing family/child roles, directiveness, values, preferences, and goals.
Conclusions:
- An international expert panel established recommendations for pediatric SDM in simple and complex decisions.
- The developed recommendations underscore the importance of personalized care in pediatric decision-making.
Objective:
To develop recommendations for pediatric shared decision-making (SDM).
Methods:
We conducted a Delphi method study from 2020 to 2021 with an international panel (n = 21) of clinicians, researchers, and parents with expertise in pediatric SDM. We conducted semistructured interviews to identify the key processes of pediatric SDM. We coded the interviews using content analysis and developed a questionnaire on the potential processes of pediatric SDM. Using a Likert scale, panelists evaluated each process twice, once for simple decisions and once for complex decisions. Panelists were provided with a summary of the results and evaluated each process again. The processes that were agreed on for simple and complex decisions were reported as "fundamental processes." The processes that were agreed on for complex decisions were reported as "additional processes."
Results:
A total of 79 recommendations were developed, including 29 fundamental processes and 14 additional processes for complex decisions. A recurring theme was the importance of personalizing the decision-making process. For example, the panel recommended that physicians should assess the family and child's desired roles in the decision-making process, assess their desired level of directiveness, and elicit and clarify their values, preferences, and goals. The panel also disagreed on several subprocesses, such as how to determine the child's role and the appropriate level of directiveness.
Conclusions:
An international expert panel developed recommendations for pediatric SDM for both simple and complex decisions. The recommendations highlight the importance of personalizing the decision-making process.
More Related Videos
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
06:15Protocol and Guidelines for Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound in Diagnosing Neonatal Pulmonary Diseases Based on International Expert Consensus
Published on: March 6, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Ethical Dilemmas II
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Reason and Intuition