Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

295
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
295
Actuarial Approach01:20

Actuarial Approach

117
The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
117
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

162
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
162
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

255
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
255
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

216
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
216
SBAR II: Application of SBAR01:14

SBAR II: Application of SBAR

4.6K
SBAR is an effective communication tool used by healthcare professionals to communicate patient information accurately. SBAR stands for Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation. For a better understanding, an example is given below.
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
4.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Feasibility of an Unfunded Multicenter Trial Group for Older Adult Burn Patients: A Retrospective Study.

Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association·2026
Same author

Two Decades on: Evaluating Patient Experiences and Long-Term Outcomes in 9/11 Survivors Treated at a New York Burn Center.

Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association·2025
Same author

Bromelain-Based Enzymatic Debridement of a Third-Degree Burn to Skin-Grafted Bowel.

The American surgeon·2025
Same author

A National Evaluation of Time to Surgery Following Burn Center Admission Utilizing the Burn Care Quality Platform Data.

Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association·2025
Same author

National Estimates and Outcomes for Supplemental Home Oxygen Therapy Injuries-A Burn Care Quality Platform Analysis.

Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association·2025
Same author

Characteristics of Verified and Designated Burn Centers.

Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 26, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

Setting the Standard: Using the ABA Burn Registry to Benchmark Risk Adjusted Mortality.

Samuel P Mandell1, Matthew H Phillips2, Sara Higginson3

  • 1UTSouthwestern Medical Center/Parkland Regional Burn Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Journal of Burn Care & Research : Official Publication of the American Burn Association
|October 11, 2022
PubMed
Summary

A new machine learning model accurately predicts burn patient mortality, enabling benchmarking across burn centers. This advanced model offers improved precision for risk-adjusted mortality assessment.

More Related Videos

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
07:51

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis

Published on: September 26, 2018

7.7K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 26, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
07:51

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis

Published on: September 26, 2018

7.7K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.3K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Informatics
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Burn Surgery Outcomes

Background:

  • Established predictors of burn center mortality include age, burn size, and inhalation injury.
  • Previous analyses lacked the scope for effective cross-center benchmarking.
  • There is a need for a reliable, risk-adjusted model for comparing burn center outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a robust statistical model for predicting burn patient mortality.
  • To enable risk-adjusted benchmarking across multiple burn centers in the U.S.
  • To leverage a large national dataset for improved mortality prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the American Burn Association 2020 Full Burn Research Dataset from the Burn Center Quality Platform (BCQP).
  • Included 130,729 subjects from 103 burn centers (July 2015 - June 2020).
  • Employed gradient-boosted regression (CatBoost) and compared it with logistic regression, evaluating with AUC and PR curves.

Main Results:

  • The CatBoost model achieved a superior test AUC of 0.980 and average precision of 0.800.
  • Logistic regression yielded an AUC of 0.951 and average precision of 0.664.
  • The CatBoost model demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity and precision compared to logistic regression.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning, specifically CatBoost, provides a highly accurate and sensitive method for predicting burn mortality.
  • The developed model enables effective risk-adjusted benchmarking for burn centers participating in the BCQP.
  • This approach enhances the ability to compare burn center performance using real-world data.