Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2025

09:49
Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
14.2K
Investigating human error in Iran's copper mines using the CREAM based on human cognitive reliability analysis
Mohammad Reza Taheri1, Seyed Bagher Mortazavi1, Hasan Asilian1
1Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran.
International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics : JOSE
|October 12, 2022
Summary
Human error is a significant safety concern in copper mines. This study used the Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM) to identify and assess cognitive errors, revealing high error rates that necessitate immediate safety improvements.
Area of Science:
- Occupational Health and Safety
- Mining Engineering
- Cognitive Psychology
Background:
- Human error is a leading cause of accidents in mining operations.
- Understanding cognitive errors is crucial for enhancing mine safety protocols.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and assess cognitive errors among copper miners.
- To apply the Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM) in a mining context.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional study conducted in an Iranian copper mine.
- Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA) for task breakdown.
- Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM) for error assessment.
Main Results:
- Human Error Probability (HEP) varied across operational units: 0.056 (extraction), 0.0315 (crushing), and 0.0177 (processing).
- Execution errors (53.4%) and observation errors (40%) were the most prevalent cognitive errors.
- Errors were primarily linked to execution, monitoring, observation, communication, diagnosis, recording, and planning.
Conclusions:
- Cognitive error rates in copper mine operational units are notably high.
- Urgent interventions are required to improve mine safety performance.
- Further analysis of factors contributing to human error can inform more effective safety strategies.

