Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory01:14

Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory

557
The cerebellum, while traditionally associated with motor control, also plays a crucial role in memory, particularly in procedural memory, which involves learning motor tasks that become automatic through repetition. For example, studies have shown that when the cerebellum is damaged, individuals or animals lose the ability to learn conditioned motor responses, such as the conditioned eye-blink response in classical conditioning experiments with rabbits. This study demonstrates the...
557
Hierarchy of Motor Control01:18

Hierarchy of Motor Control

3.2K
The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.
3.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An evolutionary conserved neural mechanism for interpersonal coordination in primates.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Dynamics of oscillatory power support the integration of perceptual and mnemonic information within the premotor cortex.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

A Relative Authorship Index: A New Metric for Evaluating Individual Contribution in Scientific Research.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

A biologically plausible decision-making model based on interacting neural populations.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Individual differences in learning and decision-making: the role of COMT Val158Met polymorphism in transitive inference.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same author

The Difficulty in Numerical Computation Impacts Motor Decisions in a Stop-Signal Task.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Effects of Task Priority and Difficulty in Multitasking Across Screens.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Compatibility Effects With Simple Lever Tools: A Replication and Extension Beyond Simple Button Responses.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Effects of Egocentric and Exocentric Supervisor Viewpoint Perspectives on Motion Plan Legibility and Decision Support in Automated Spacecraft Docking Maneuvers.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

System-Wide Trust (SWT) Versus Component-Specific Trust (CST) in Multi-Agent Human-Agent Teams: Individual Variability in Trust Bias.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Driver Adaptation to Partially Automated Driving in Urban Environments: Effects of Repeated Exposure and System Capabilities on Drivers' Trust, Monitoring, and Response.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Modeling Human Expertise in a Sanding Task.

Human factors·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 26, 2025

A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance
07:19

A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance

Published on: March 19, 2020

6.0K

Response Preparation Affects Cognitive Motor Control.

Marta Andujar1,2, Isabel Beatrice Marc1,2, Valentina Giuffrida1,2

  • 1Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, and Behavioral Neuroscience PhD Program, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Human Factors
|October 12, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

High response preparation impairs action control, leading to faster reactions but more errors. This study highlights how preparation affects our ability to inhibit actions when needed.

Keywords:
control processdecision makingmotor controlperceptual-motor performanceresponse time

More Related Videos

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior
05:05

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Published on: December 2, 2022

1.7K
The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

8.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 26, 2025

A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance
07:19

A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance

Published on: March 19, 2020

6.0K
Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior
05:05

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Published on: December 2, 2022

1.7K
The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

8.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Action control is vital for navigating complex environments.
  • Response preparation shortens reaction times but its impact on action control is unclear.
  • Investigated response preparation's effect on action generation control within a stop-signal task.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine how response preparation influences the ability to inhibit actions.
  • To explore the trade-off between response speed and action control under varying preparation levels.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a visuo-motor stop-signal task.
  • Manipulated levels of response preparation.
  • Measured response times and the probability of incorrect responses to stop signals.

Main Results:

  • Increased response preparation significantly reduced action control.
  • Higher preparation led to shorter response times.
  • A higher probability of erroneous responses to stop signals was observed with increased preparation.

Conclusions:

  • High levels of response preparation hinder an individual's ability to control their actions.
  • Response preparation is a critical factor in flexibly controlling reactions to stimuli.
  • Findings have implications for designing systems that balance response speed and accuracy.