Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2025

A Test Bed to Examine Helmet Fit and Retention and Biomechanical Measures of Head and Neck Injury in Simulated Impact
Published on: September 21, 2017
Headgear safety attitudes among women's lacrosse stakeholders: Qualitative results
Patricia M Kelshaw1, Thomas G Bowman2, Meredith E Kneavel3,4
1Department of Kinesiology, Brain Research & Assessment Initiative of New Hampshire (BRAIN) Laboratory, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, USA.
Objective:
To explore diverse stakeholders' perceptions of headgear use in collegiate women's lacrosse.
Participants:
189 collegiate women's lacrosse stakeholders (players: n = 87; coaches: n = 71; officials: n = 32).
Methods:
Participants completed online open-ended qualitative questions surrounding headgear use in the sport. Responses were coded by the research team via inductive reasoning.
Results:
Stakeholders felt that incorporating headgear use into women's lacrosse would increase aggression and change the nature of the sport. Some felt that headgear was important for injury risk mitigation and invoked a need for research and development. Stakeholders raised the need for coaching and officiating improvement as primary injury prevention measures. Players were concerned about esthetics and performance limitations. Finally, many felt that it should be left to player choice to wear headgear or not.
Conclusion:
Most stakeholders invoke concerns of risk compensation and changing the nature of the sport of women's lacrosse, and are in favor of headgear remaining optional.
Related Concept Videos
Obedience
Personal Protective Equipment
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Attitudes
Survey Safety
PPE Use in Healthcare Settings II: Doffing

