Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2025

Screening and Identification of Small Peptides Targeting Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor2 using a Phage Display Peptide Library
Published on: September 30, 2019
Patient Selection Approaches in FGFR Inhibitor Trials-Many Paths to the Same End?
Peter Ellinghaus1, Daniel Neureiter2,3, Hendrik Nogai4
1Global Clinical Development Oncology, Merck Healthcare KGaA, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany.
Abstract:
Inhibitors of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling have been investigated in various human cancer diseases. Recently, the first compounds received FDA approval in biomarker-selected patient populations. Different approaches and technologies have been applied in clinical trials, ranging from protein (immunohistochemistry) to mRNA expression (e.g., RNA in situ hybridization) and to detection of various DNA alterations (e.g., copy number variations, mutations, gene fusions). We review, here, the advantages and limitations of the different technologies and discuss the importance of tissue and disease context in identifying the best predictive biomarker for FGFR targeting therapies.
Insights
Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors are approved for specific cancer patients. This review compares technologies for identifying predictive biomarkers, emphasizing tissue and disease context for FGFR-targeted therapies.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Biomarker Discovery
Background:
- Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling is implicated in various human cancers.
- Recent FDA approvals highlight the clinical relevance of FGFR inhibitors in biomarker-selected populations.
- Diverse technologies are employed in clinical trials to assess FGFR pathway alterations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and compare the advantages and limitations of different technologies used for biomarker detection in FGFR-targeted cancer therapy.
- To discuss the critical role of tissue and disease context in selecting the optimal predictive biomarker.
- To provide insights for the effective application of FGFR inhibitors in clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on technologies for FGFR biomarker assessment.
- Comparative analysis of protein (immunohistochemistry), mRNA (RNA in situ hybridization), and DNA alteration detection methods (copy number variations, mutations, gene fusions).
- Discussion of the impact of tissue and disease context on biomarker utility.
Main Results:
- Various technologies offer different strengths and weaknesses for detecting FGFR alterations.
- Protein, mRNA, and DNA-based methods each have unique applications and limitations.
- Tissue and disease context significantly influence the choice and interpretation of biomarkers.
Conclusions:
- Accurate identification of predictive biomarkers is crucial for the success of FGFR-targeted therapies.
- A comprehensive understanding of available technologies and their limitations is essential.
- Integrating tissue and disease context is key to optimizing patient selection for FGFR inhibitors.
More Related Videos
09:38Establishment and Characterization of Three Afatinib-resistant Lung Adenocarcinoma PC-9 Cell Lines Developed with Increasing Doses of Afatinib
Published on: June 26, 2019
05:29A Rapid Screening Workflow to Identify Potential Combination Therapy for GBM using Patient-Derived Glioma Stem Cells
Published on: March 28, 2021