Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2025

Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
Outcomes of hemi- vs. total arch replacement in acute type A aortic dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Likang Ma1,2,3, Tianci Chai1,2,3, Xiaojie Yang4
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Insights
Hemiarch replacement for acute type A aortic dissection shows better early outcomes, including lower mortality and fewer complications. However, it is associated with a higher late mortality rate compared to total arch replacement.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
- Aortic Surgery
Background:
- Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) presents significant surgical challenges with high mortality rates.
- The optimal surgical strategy, specifically hemiarch versus total arch replacement, remains a subject of debate.
Approach:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted, searching major databases for comparative studies.
- Included 23 observational studies involving 4,576 patients comparing hemiarch and total arch replacement for ATAAD.
Key Points:
- Hemiarch replacement demonstrated significantly lower early mortality (RR=0.82), postoperative permanent neurological dysfunction (RR=0.72), and renal failure/dialysis (RR=0.82).
- Conversely, hemiarch replacement was associated with a higher rate of late mortality (RR=1.37).
- No significant differences were observed in re-operation for bleeding, aortic re-operation, or pneumonia.
Conclusions:
- Hemiarch replacement offers superior early outcomes in ATAAD management.
- Total arch replacement may be associated with better long-term survival.
- Surgical decisions should consider dissection extent and surgeon experience for optimal patient prognosis.
Background:
Acute type A aortic dissections (ATAAD) pose a challenge to surgeons due to high mortality, and decision making regarding the appropriate procedure is controversial. This study compared the outcomes of hemiarch and total arch replacement for ATAAD.
Methods:
The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for comparative studies on hemiarch versus total arch replacement that were published before May 1, 2022.
Results:
We included 23 observational studies with a total of 4,576 patients. Combined data analysis showed that early mortality (RR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.70-0.97; P = 0.02), incidence of postoperative permanent neurological dysfunction (RR = 0.72; 95%CI:0.54∼0.94; P = 0.02), and incidence of renal failure and dialysis (RR = 0.82; 95%CI:0.71∼0.96; P = 0.01) were all lower for hemiarch than for total arch replacement. However, hemiarch replacement had a higher rate of late mortality (RR = 1.37; 95%CI:1.10∼1.71; P = 0.005). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of re-operation for bleeding, aortic re-operation, or postoperative pneumonia.
Conclusion:
In this study, hemiarch replacement had better early outcomes but a higher late mortality rate than total arch replacement. Decisions regarding the extent of arch repair should be made according to location and extent of ATAAD and the experience of surgeons to ensure the most favorable prognosis.
Systematic Review Registration:
[INPLASY.COM], identifier [INPLASY202250088].
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

