Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2025

Induction of Nephrotic Syndrome in Mice by Retrobulbar Injection of Doxorubicin and Prevention of Volume Retention by Sustained Release Aprotinin
Published on: May 6, 2018
[Efficacy of plasma exchange in severe crescentic IgA nephropathy: A multicentered, cohort study]
1Renal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Nephrology, Peking University; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Research Units of Diagnosis and Treatment of lmmune-Mediated Kidney Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100191, China.
Insights
Plasma exchange therapy did not improve outcomes for patients with crescentic IgA nephropathy (IgAN). This study found no significant difference in renal survival between patients receiving plasma exchange and those on intensive immunosuppressive therapy alone.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Immunology
- Internal Medicine
Background:
- Crescentic IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is a severe form of IgAN characterized by rapid kidney function decline.
- Treatment strategies for crescentic IgAN aim to halt disease progression and preserve kidney function.
- The role of plasma exchange therapy in addition to immunosuppression for crescentic IgAN remains controversial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of adjunctive plasma exchange therapy compared to intensive immunosuppressive therapy alone in patients with crescentic IgA nephropathy.
- To assess the impact of plasma exchange on renal survival and progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 95 patients with crescentic IgAN from 9 Chinese centers (January 2012 - September 2020).
- Propensity score matching (1:1 ratio) was used to compare patients receiving adjunctive plasma exchange therapy with those receiving intensive immunosuppressive therapy.
- Primary outcome was end-stage kidney disease (ESKD); renal survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Main Results:
- After propensity score matching, 23 patients were in each group (plasma exchange vs. intensive immunosuppression).
- No significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics including eGFR, proteinuria, crescent percentage, or steroid use between the groups.
- Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference in renal survival rates between the two treatment groups (Log-rank test, P=0.933).
Conclusions:
- Adjunctive plasma exchange therapy, when added to conventional intense immunosuppressive therapy, did not improve the prognosis for patients with crescentic IgA nephropathy.
- Current evidence suggests that plasma exchange may not offer additional benefit over standard intensive immunosuppression for this condition.
Objective:
To evaluate the efficacy of plasma exchange therapy on crescentic IgA nephropathy (IgAN).
Methods:
A retrospective analysis was performed in a cohort of patients with crescentic IgAN from January 2012 to September 2020 at 9 sites across China. Clinical and pathological data, as well as therapeutic regimens, were collected. In order to minimize the effect of potential confounders in baseline characteristics, propensity score matching using a 1 ∶1 ratio nearest neighbor algorithm was performed between the adjunctive plasma exchange therapy group and the intensive immunosuppressive therapy group. The primary outcome was end-stage of kidney disease (ESKD). Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the difference in renal survival between the two groups.
Results:
A total of 95 crescentic IgAN patients with acute kidney disease were included in this study, including 37 (38.9%) patients receiving adjunctive plasma exchange therapy, and 58 (61.1%) patients receiving intensive immunosuppressive therapy. In the whole cohort, the baseline eGFR was 12.77 (7.28, 21.29) mL/(min·1.73 m2), 24-hour urinary protein quantification was 5.9 (4.0, 8.9) g, and crescent percentage was 64.71% (54.55%, 73.68%). In the study, 23 patients in each group were matched after propensity score matching The median follow-up time was 7 (1, 26) months. As a whole, 29 patients (63.0%) reached ESKD, including 16 patients (69.6%) in the adjunctive plasma exchange therapy group and 13 (56.5%) patients in the intensive immunosuppressive therapy group.. There were no stastical difference between the two groups in terms of baseline eGFR [14.30 (9.31, 17.58) mL/(min·1.73 m2) vs. 11.45 (5.59, 20.79) mL/(min·1.73 m2)], 24-hour urinary protein (7.4±3.4) g vs. (6.6±3.8) g, crescent percentage 64.49%±13.23% vs. 66.41%±12.65% and the proportion of patients received steroid therapy[23 (100.0%) vs. 21 (91.3%)] (All P>0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that there was no significant difference in renal survival rate between the two groups (Log-rank test, P=0.933).
Conclusion:
The adjunctive plasma exchange therapy in addition to conventional intense immunosuppressive therapy did not additionally improve the prognosis of crescentic IgA nephropathy.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Nephrotic Syndrome II : Assessment and Medical Management
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Nephrotic Syndrome I : Introduction
Nephrotic Syndrome III : Nursing Management
Acute Kidney Injury I: Introduction

