Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Considerations for Embedding Inclusive Research Principles in the Design and Execution of Clinical Trials
Ubong Peters1,2, Brenna Turner3,4, Daniel Alvarez4,5
1Product Development - Global Clinical Operations, South San Francisco, CA, USA. peters.ubong@gene.com.
Abstract:
There is a growing recognition that the clinical research enterprise has a diversity problem, given that many clinical trials recruit historically marginalized individuals or patients reflective of real-world data at a rate that is far below the incidence and prevalence of the disease for which the investigational therapy or device is targeting. This lack of diversity in clinical research participation can obscure the safety and efficacy of drug therapies and limits our collective ability to develop effective treatments for all patients, leading to even wider health disparities. This review article provides an in-depth analysis of the impact of this bias on public health, along with a description of some of the barriers that prevent historically marginalized populations from participating in clinical research. Some practical solutions that can be employed to increase diversity in clinical trial participation are also discussed, including the crucial role clinical trial sponsors, research organizations, patients, and caregivers need to play in supporting the industry to achieve this ambitious but necessary goal.
Insights
Clinical trials lack diversity, underrepresenting marginalized groups and hindering equitable treatment development. Addressing participation barriers is crucial for public health and reducing health disparities.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Research
- Public Health
- Health Disparities
Background:
- Clinical trials often fail to recruit diverse populations, particularly historically marginalized individuals.
- This underrepresentation is disproportionate to disease incidence and prevalence, impacting real-world data.
- Lack of diversity obscures drug safety and efficacy, exacerbating health disparities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the impact of diversity bias in clinical research on public health.
- To identify barriers preventing marginalized populations from participating in clinical trials.
- To discuss practical solutions for increasing diversity in clinical trial participation.
Main Methods:
- This review article provides an in-depth analysis.
- It examines the impact of bias on public health.
- It describes barriers and proposes solutions.
Main Results:
- The lack of diversity in clinical research participation obscures drug safety and efficacy.
- It limits the development of effective treatments for all patients.
- This contributes to wider health disparities.
Conclusions:
- Increasing diversity in clinical trials is essential for equitable healthcare.
- Addressing participation barriers requires a collaborative effort from sponsors, organizations, patients, and caregivers.
- Achieving diversity is a necessary goal for improving public health outcomes.
More Related Videos
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Ethics in Research
Blinding