Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2025

Intracellular Phosphoflow Cytometry of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patient-Derived Xenotransplants
Published on: June 6, 2025
Evidence-based support for phenotypic drug discovery in acute myeloid leukemia
Sean Vandersluis1, Jennifer C Reid1, Luca Orlando1
1Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract:
The discovery and development of effective drugs for cancer patients has seen limited success in the clinic from phase I trials onward. The high attrition rate of current drug development approaches requires careful evaluation to provide a better understanding of the factors that correlate with or predict positive clinical outcomes. Here, we examine pre-clinical drug development approaches and conduct a meta-analysis of 2918 clinical studies involving 466 unique drugs tested in clinical trials for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Our goal was to determine whether there are key shared pre-clinical characteristics that ultimately relate to successful or unsuccessful drugs in patients. We provide an evidence-based recommendation for the use of phenotypic drug discovery rather than other methods during pre-clinical development. Although our analysis was limited to AML, similar analyses are likely to be informative for other tumor-specific drug discovery campaigns, informing and improving the foundational discovery screens and platforms for other cancers.
Insights
Phenotypic drug discovery shows promise for improving cancer drug development. This meta-analysis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) trials suggests focusing on this approach to increase clinical success rates.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Translational Medicine
Background:
- Cancer drug development faces high attrition rates from early clinical trials.
- Understanding factors predicting clinical success is crucial for improving drug development pipelines.
- Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) serves as a model for investigating drug development challenges.
Approach:
- A comprehensive meta-analysis of 2918 clinical studies involving 466 unique drugs tested in AML.
- Examination of pre-clinical drug development strategies and their correlation with clinical outcomes.
- Comparative analysis of different pre-clinical drug discovery methods.
Key Points:
- Phenotypic drug discovery demonstrated a stronger correlation with positive clinical outcomes compared to other pre-clinical methods.
- Identified shared pre-clinical characteristics that distinguish successful from unsuccessful drugs in AML.
- The study highlights the need for evidence-based recommendations in pre-clinical drug selection.
Conclusions:
- Phenotypic drug discovery is recommended as a preferred pre-clinical approach for cancer therapeutics.
- Findings from AML drug development may inform and improve discovery platforms for other cancer types.
- Optimizing pre-clinical strategies can enhance the efficiency and success rate of clinical cancer drug development.
Related Concept Videos
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...

