Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

785
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
785
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

213
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
213
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

750
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
750
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

936
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
936
The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

23.6K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
23.6K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.4K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

DFT exchange: sharing perspectives on the workhorse of quantum chemistry and materials science.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2022
Same author

Modulation of the Directionality of Hole Transfer between the Base and the Sugar-Phosphate Backbone in DNA with the Number of Sulfur Atoms in the Phosphate Group.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2022
Same author

Mechanism of (SCN)<sub>2</sub><sup>·-</sup> Formation and Decay in Neutral and Basic KSCN Solution under Irradiation from a Pico- to Microsecond Range.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2019
Same author

Ultrafast Electron Attachment and Hole Transfer Following Ionizing Radiation of Aqueous Uridine Monophosphate.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2018
Same author

Picosecond Pulse Radiolysis Study on the Radiation-Induced Reactions in Neat Tributyl Phosphate.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2018
Same author

Observation and Simulation of Transient Anion Oligomers (LiClO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>n</sub><sup>-</sup> (n = 1-4) in Diethyl Carbonate LiClO<sub>4</sub> Solutions.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2017
Same journal

Revisiting crossed-correlated baths in open quantum systems simulated by HEOM or T-TEDOPA.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Vesicle size and membrane composition control monomer transfer pathways in multicomponent lipid vesicles.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Polaron-mediated exciton dynamics of P(NDI2OD-T2) unveiled by transient absorption spectroscopy under electrochemical conditions.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Green-Kubo relation in a mesoscale odd fluid model.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Nitrogenation of microscopic MoS2 surfaces by oxidation scanning probe lithography.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Molecular structure, binding, and disorder in TDBC-Ag plexcitonic assemblies.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 25, 2025

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.3K

Prediction uncertainty validation for computational chemists.

Pascal Pernot1

  • 1Institut de Chimie Physique, UMR8000 CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 91405 Orsay, France.

The Journal of Chemical Physics
|October 15, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces the calibration-sharpness (CS) framework for validating prediction uncertainty (PU) in computational chemistry. It offers practical methods to assess the reliability of computational chemistry predictions.

More Related Videos

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.3K
Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 25, 2025

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.3K
Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.3K
Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.8K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Chemistry
  • Machine Learning
  • Scientific Computing

Background:

  • Validation of prediction uncertainty (PU) is crucial for modern computational chemistry.
  • The calibration-sharpness (CS) framework, originally from meteorology, is increasingly used for validating uncertainty-aware machine learning (ML) methods.
  • The CS framework offers a principled approach for any PU validation, extending beyond ML applications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a step-by-step introduction to PU validation using the CS framework, tailored for computational chemistry.
  • To present a range of methods, from basic graphical checks to advanced local calibration statistics.
  • To introduce the concept of tightness within the CS framework.

Main Methods:

  • Adaptation of the calibration-sharpness (CS) framework for computational chemistry.
  • Implementation of elementary graphical checks for PU validation.
  • Application of sophisticated local calibration statistics and the concept of tightness.

Main Results:

  • The study illustrates CS framework methods on synthetic datasets.
  • Methods are applied to real-world uncertainty quantification data from computational chemistry literature.
  • Demonstrates the applicability and utility of the CS framework for computational chemistry PU validation.

Conclusions:

  • The CS framework provides a robust and versatile tool for validating prediction uncertainty in computational chemistry.
  • The presented methods enable rigorous assessment of prediction reliability, enhancing trust in computational results.
  • This work facilitates the adoption of advanced PU validation techniques in the computational chemistry community.