Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2025

Conducting Maximal and Submaximal Endurance Exercise Testing to Measure Physiological and Biological Responses to Acute Exercise in Humans
Published on: October 17, 2018
Methodological considerations for the determination of VO2max in healthy men
Pasquale J Succi1, Brian Benitez2, Minyoung Kwak2
1Department of Kinesiology and Health Promotion, University of Kentucky, 1210 University Drive, Lexington, KY, 40502, USA. pj.succi@uky.edu.
Purpose:
A square-wave verification bout to confirm maximal oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]O2max) from a graded exercise test (GXT) has been recommended. This study ascertained if a verification bout is necessary to determine [Formula: see text]O2max in moderately trained men.
Methods:
Ten men (24 ± 4 years) completed familiarization and two treadmill GXTs, followed by a submaximal verification bout to determine [Formula: see text]O2GXT and [Formula: see text]O2verification (highest [Formula: see text]O2 from each testing method). After completing the GXT, subjects rested for 5 min then performed a verification bout at 90% speed and 50% incline at termination of the GXT. The analyses included a 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC2,1), standard errors of the measurement (SEM), minimal differences (MD), and coefficients of variation (CoV).
Results:
There was no test (test 1 vs test 2) × method (GXT vs verification) interaction (p = 0.584), or main effect for test (p = 0.320), but there was a main effect for method (p = 0.011). The [Formula: see text]O2GXT (50.9±3.0 mL·kg-1·min-1) was greater than [Formula: see text]O2verification (46.9 ± mL·kg-1·min-1). The [Formula: see text]O2GXT (ICC = 0.988, SEM = 1.0 mL·kg-1 min-1, MD = 2.9 mL kg-1 min-1, CoV = 2.03%) and [Formula: see text]O2verification (ICC = 0.976, SEM = 1.0 mL·kg-1 min-1, MD = 2.7 mL·kg-1·min-1, CoV = 2.03%) demonstrated "excellent" reliability. No subject exceeded the MD for [Formula: see text]O2GXT test-retest or for [Formula: see text]O2verification test-retest, but 50% of subjects had a [Formula: see text]O2GXT that was greater than the [Formula: see text]O2verification (> MD).
Conclusion:
While [Formula: see text]O2GXT and [Formula: see text]O2verification demonstrated excellent reliability, [Formula: see text]O2GXT from a stand-alone GXT provided higher estimates of [Formula: see text]O2 and, therefore, should be considered [Formula: see text]O2max. The lack of test-retest differences in [Formula: see text]O2GXT above the MD indicated that subjects achieved their highest [Formula: see text]O2 ([Formula: see text]O2max) from a standalone GXT. Therefore, the verification bout may not be required to confirm [Formula: see text]O2max in this population.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Special considerations while measuring oxygen saturation
Ensuring accuracy in vital sign recordings while prioritizing patient comfort and minimizing anxiety is...
Respiratory Volumes and Capacities
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:

