Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2025

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
Published on: December 9, 2012
Hydro-economic model framework for achieving groundwater, food, and economy trade-offs by optimizing crop patterns
Qingtao Ma1, Yonghui Yang1, Zhuping Sheng2
1Key Laboratory of Agricultural Water Resources, Hebei Laboratory of Agricultural Water-saving, Center for Agricultural Resources Research, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 286 Huaizhong Road, Shijiazhuang 050021, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Abstract:
When allocating water resources, stakeholders (such as water departments, agricultural sector actors, and farmers) aim to maximize their benefits. This leads to conflicts between water savings, food security, and profit growth, causing major challenges for water managers. A hydro-economic model was developed to alleviate groundwater sustainability, food security, and economic growth (GFE) conflicts through crop pattern optimization. This model combines groundwater, agronomic, and economic sub-models to simulate spatiotemporal variations in groundwater level, irrigation requirement, crop production, and net profit. The NSGA-II algorithm was used to maximize net profits while minimizing groundwater extraction and food reduction through crop pattern optimization in irrigation areas and under crop production constraints. Then, using the Baoding Plain as the study area, three scenarios with no external water supply and nine scenarios with an external water supply of 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9 km3/y were designed. The present crop pattern caused a groundwater decline of 0.32 m/y and an overdraft of 0.61 km3/y. The three scenarios without external water supply showed different options for maximizing net profit, minimizing groundwater extraction, and minimizing food reduction without affecting food production, food self-sufficiency or groundwater sustainability. All three scenarios cannot simultaneously satisfy the GFE target. With an external water supply of 0.3 km3/y, only one scenario met the GFE target; with that of 0.6 km3/y, all scenarios met the GFE target; and with that of 0.9 km3/y, groundwater levels increased, profits overflowed, and food overproduction occurred.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Design Example: Design of an Irrigation Channel
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
What is Climate?
Typical Model Studies

