Laryngectomees' and nonlaryngectomees' perceptions of three methods of alaryngeal voicing

The purpose of this investigation was to compare the proficiency ratings made by laryngectomee and nonlaryngectomee judges when evaluating videotaped samples of laryngeal and alaryngeal speakers. A group of laryngectomee judges and three groups of nonlaryngectomized judges completed proficiency ratings for the following speakers: laryngeal (n = 10); electrolarynx (n = 11); esophageal (n = 12); and tracheoesophageal puncture (n = 10). Significant differences between laryngectomee and nonlaryngectomee judges were found when rating alaryngeal speakers, but not when rating normal, laryngeal speakers. Differences in judge group ratings varied according to the voicing method of the speakers and according to the vocal parameter being rated.