Comparison of Differences in Complications and Revision After Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty from Plating vs.

Senthil Sambandam1, Varatharaj Mounasamy2, Dane Wukich2

  • 1University of Texas Southwestern, Staff Orthopedic Surgeon, Dallas VAMC, Dallas, Texas.

Insights

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) after prior hip surgery poses increased complexity. Conversion from hemiarthroplasty to THA shows higher infection and revision risks, urging caution in patient selection.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Arthroplasty Research
  • Complication Analysis

Background:

  • Previous hip surgery complicates total hip arthroplasty (THA).
  • Investigating complication rates of THA conversion from prior hip procedures.
  • Examining THA after intertrochanteric fracture fixation (plate or nail) and hemiarthroplasty.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare complication rates of THA following three specific prior hip surgeries.
  • To evaluate risks including transfusion, surgical site infection (SSI), periprosthetic fracture, dislocation, and revision.
  • To contrast these risks against primary THA complication rates.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective study using the PearlDiver database (2010-2019).
  • Included patients undergoing THA with prior hemiarthroplasty, plate fixation (CPT 27444), or nail fixation (CPT 27445) within two years.
  • Compared complication rates to 117,936 primary THA patients.

Main Results:

  • Nailing group showed highest transfusion risk (OR=2.34).
  • Hemiarthroplasty group had the highest SSI risk (OR=9.25) and 2-year revision risk (OR=10.53).
  • Specific CPT codes were used for procedure identification.

Conclusions:

  • Conversion from hemiarthroplasty to THA is linked to increased infection and revision risks.
  • Surgeons should be cautious with primary hemiarthroplasty for severe fractures, especially in active elderly patients.
  • This highlights the importance of careful pre-operative planning for revision THA.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos