Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Diagnostic errors using the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire with a mixed clinical population.

J E Dalton, S L Pederson, B E Blom

    Journal of Gerontology
    |September 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study examined the usefulness of the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) in diagnosing cognitive impairment among a mixed group of neurologic and psychiatric inpatients. The researchers compared SPMSQ scores with clinical and neuropsychological diagnoses. They found that SPMSQ scores did not reliably predict brain function status. The study suggests that a normal SPMSQ score should not be taken as proof of normal brain function but may be nonspecific in mixed clinical populations. The findings highlight the need for caution in interpreting SPMSQ results and recommend combining multiple diagnostic approaches for more accurate assessments.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Association between fibromyalgia and adverse perioperative outcomes.

    British journal of anaesthesia·2014
    Same author

    Preoperative blood glucose concentrations and postoperative outcomes after elective non-cardiac surgery: an observational study.

    British journal of anaesthesia·2013
    Same author

    Association between preoperative statin therapy and postoperative change in glomerular filtration rate in endovascular aortic surgery.

    British journal of anaesthesia·2012
    Same author

    A randomized controlled study to assess patients' understanding of and consenting for clinical trials using two different consent form presentations.

    Minerva anestesiologica·2012
    Same author

    Effect of dexamethasone on the duration of interscalene nerve blocks with ropivacaine or bupivacaine.

    British journal of anaesthesia·2011
    Same author

    An evaluation of underbody forced-air and resistive heating during hypothermic, on-pump cardiac surgery.

    Anaesthesia·2011

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical neuropsychology
    • Psychiatric diagnostics
    • Cognitive assessment tools

    Background:

    Current diagnostic tools for cognitive impairment often lack specificity when applied to mixed clinical populations. Prior research has shown that brief screening instruments can miss subtle neurological deficits. This gap motivated a closer look at the SPMSQ's performance in diverse patient groups. No prior work had resolved how well the SPMSQ aligns with clinical and neuropsychological findings. Existing studies typically focus on homogeneous samples, limiting generalizability. This uncertainty drove the need for a broader evaluation. The SPMSQ is widely used but its diagnostic accuracy remains unclear in mixed settings. Understanding its limitations could improve clinical decision-making.

    Purpose Of The Study:

    The study aimed to assess the SPMSQ's validity in diagnosing cognitive impairment among mixed clinical populations. It specifically investigated whether SPMSQ scores correlate with clinical or neuropsychological diagnoses. The motivation stemmed from observed diagnostic inconsistencies in real-world settings. A mixed sample of neurologic and psychiatric inpatients was chosen to reflect clinical reality. The goal was to determine if SPMSQ results reliably indicate brain function status. The researchers sought to clarify the questionnaire's diagnostic utility in complex cases. They proposed that SPMSQ scores might not align with established diagnostic criteria. This study aimed to inform better interpretation of SPMSQ outcomes.

    Keywords:
    Cognitive assessmentMental status questionnaireNeuropsychological evaluationClinical diagnosis accuracy

    Frequently Asked Questions

    The study suggests a normal SPMSQ score may not reflect normal brain function but could be nonspecific in mixed clinical populations.

    The study included 40 inpatients with neurologic or psychiatric conditions, representing a mixed clinical sample.

    The study notes that laboratory data like CT scans and EEGs were available for 45% of participants, possibly due to clinical priorities or resource limitations.

    Clinical diagnoses and neuropsychological evaluations using an extensive test battery were used alongside the SPMSQ.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Methods:

    The study involved 40 inpatients with neurologic or psychiatric conditions. Clinical and neuropsychological diagnoses were independently determined for each participant. The SPMSQ was administered to all subjects as part of a broader assessment battery. Laboratory data such as CT scans and EEG results were available for 45% of participants. Neuropsychological evaluations used a comprehensive test battery to assess organic impairment. Clinical diagnoses were based on standard medical evaluations and patient history. The SPMSQ scores were compared against both types of diagnoses to assess validity. Statistical analysis evaluated correlations between SPMSQ scores and diagnostic outcomes.

    Main Results:

    The SPMSQ scores did not significantly correlate with clinical diagnoses of cognitive impairment. Similarly, no strong relationship was found between SPMSQ scores and neuropsychological assessments. The majority of participants had mixed clinical profiles complicating interpretation. Normal SPMSQ scores were not reliably associated with normal brain function. The lack of correlation suggests limited diagnostic utility in mixed populations. Laboratory data availability did not improve SPMSQ's diagnostic accuracy. The study found no evidence that SPMSQ scores predict organic cognitive deficits. These findings challenge the assumption that SPMSQ scores reflect true cognitive status.

    Conclusions:

    The authors propose that normal SPMSQ scores should not be interpreted as evidence of normal brain function. Instead, they suggest these scores may be nonspecific in mixed clinical populations. The study's findings indicate limited diagnostic accuracy for the SPMSQ in complex cases. The researchers did not claim the SPMSQ is invalid overall but caution against overinterpretation. They recommend further validation in more homogeneous patient groups. The study highlights the need for caution in using SPMSQ for definitive cognitive assessments. The authors did not propose new diagnostic tools or future research directions. Their conclusion emphasizes the importance of combining multiple diagnostic approaches.

    The main finding was that SPMSQ scores did not significantly correlate with either clinical or neuropsychological diagnoses.

    The authors recommend that normal SPMSQ scores should be regarded as nonspecific rather than indicative of normal brain functioning.