Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2025

Isolated Hepatic Perfusion as a Treatment for Liver Metastases of Uveal Melanoma
Published on: January 25, 2015
Intermittent MEK inhibition for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma
Shaheer Khan1, Sapna P Patel2, Alexander N Shoushtari3
1Department of Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Introduction:
Uveal melanoma (UM) is associated with poor outcomes in the metastatic setting and harbors activating mutations resulting in upregulation of MAPK signaling in almost all cases. The efficacy of selumetinib, an oral allosteric inhibitor of MEK1/2, was limited when administered at a continual dosing schedule of 75 mg BID. Preclinical studies demonstrate that intermittent MEK inhibition reduces compensatory pathway activation and promotes T cell activation. We hypothesized that intermittent dosing of selumetinib would reduce toxicity, allow for the administration of increased doses, and achieve more complete pathway inhibition, thus resulting in improved antitumor activity.
Methods:
We conducted a phase Ib trial of selumetinib using an intermittent dosing schedule in patients with metastatic UM. The primary objective was to estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and assess safety and tolerability. Secondary objectives included assessment of the overall response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Tumor biopsies were collected at baseline, on day 3 (on treatment), and between days 11-14 (off treatment) from 9 patients for pharmacodynamic (PD) assessments.
Results:
29 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of selumetinib across 4 dose levels (DL; DL1: 100 mg BID; DL2: 125 mg BID; DL3: 150 mg BID; DL4: 175 mg BID). All patients experienced a treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), with 5/29 (17%) developing a grade 3 or higher TRAE. Five dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were observed: 2/20 in DL2, 2/5 in DL3, 1/1 in DL4. The estimated MTD was 150 mg BID (DL3), with an estimated probability of toxicity of 29% (90% probability interval 16%-44%). No responses were observed; 11/29 patients achieved a best response of stable disease (SD). The median PFS and OS were 1.8 months (95% CI 1.7, 4.5) and 7.1 months (95% CI 5.3, 11.5). PD analysis demonstrated at least partial pathway inhibition in all samples at day 3, with reactivation between days 11-14 in 7 of those cases.
Conclusions:
We identified 150 mg BID as the MTD of intermittent selumetinib, representing a 100% increase over the continuous dose MTD (75 mg BID). However, no significant clinical efficacy was observed using this dosing schedule.
Insights
Intermittent selumetinib dosing in metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) reached a higher maximum tolerated dose (MTD) but did not improve clinical efficacy. Further research is needed to optimize MEK inhibition strategies for UM patients.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) has poor outcomes, with MAPK pathway activation common.
- Continuous selumetinib (MEK inhibitor) showed limited efficacy at 75 mg BID.
- Preclinical data suggested intermittent MEK inhibition may enhance antitumor activity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and tolerability of intermittent selumetinib dosing in metastatic UM.
- To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of this intermittent schedule.
- To assess preliminary efficacy (response rate, PFS, OS) and pharmacodynamics.
Main Methods:
- Phase Ib trial enrolling 29 patients with metastatic UM.
- Intermittent selumetinib dosing at escalating dose levels (100-175 mg BID).
- Safety, tolerability, MTD, response rate, PFS, OS, and tumor pharmacodynamics were assessed.
Main Results:
- The MTD was determined to be 150 mg BID, a 100% increase over the continuous dose MTD.
- All patients experienced treatment-related adverse events; 17% had grade 3 or higher.
- No objective responses were observed; median PFS was 1.8 months and median OS was 7.1 months.
Conclusions:
- Intermittent selumetinib dosing at 150 mg BID is feasible in metastatic UM.
- This dosing schedule did not demonstrate significant clinical efficacy.
- Further investigation into optimized MEK inhibition strategies is warranted.
More Related Videos
05:46Implantation and Evaluation of Melanoma in the Murine Choroid via Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: December 2, 2022
06:46Ortho- and Ectopic Zebrafish Xeno-Engraftment of Ocular Melanoma to Recapitulate Primary Tumor and Experimental Metastasis Development
Published on: September 4, 2021