Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2025

Simulating Impacts of Ice Storms on Forest Ecosystems
Published on: June 30, 2020
Evaluating Uncertainty and Modes of Variability for Antarctic Atmospheric Rivers
Christine A Shields1, Jonathan D Wille2, Allison B Marquardt Collow3,4
1Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder CO USA.
Abstract:
Antarctic atmospheric rivers (ARs) are driven by their synoptic environments and lead to profound and varying impacts along the coastlines and over the continent. The definition and detection of ARs over Antarctica accounts for large uncertainty in AR metrics, and consequently, impacts quantification. We find that Antarctic-specific detection tools consistently capture the AR footprint inland over ice sheets, whereas most global detection tools do not. Large-scale synoptic environments and associated ARs, however, are broadly consistent across detection tools. Using data from the Atmospheric River Tracking Method Intercomparison Project and global reanalyses, we quantify the uncertainty in Antarctic AR metrics and evaluate large-scale environments in the context of decadal and interannual modes of variability. The Antarctic western hemisphere has stronger connections to both decadal and interannual modes of variability compared to East Antarctica, and the Indian Ocean Dipole's influence on Antarctic ARs is stronger while in phase with El Nino Southern Oscillation.
Related Concept Videos
Precipitation Processes
Rapidly Varying Flow
Types of Coprecipitation
Sometimes, ions in a crystal lattice can undergo isomorphous replacement by inclusions of similar charge and size. For...
Random Error
Precipitation and Co-precipitation
Precipitation Gravimetry
In determining nickel by gravimetric analysis, a precipitant of ethanolic dimethylglyoxime is added to a hot nickel salt solution. This is quickly followed by the dropwise addition of dilute ammonia solution until precipitation occurs. A...

