Carotid doppler indices do not predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing coronary

Saba Khan1, Sandeep Kumar Mishra2, Satyen Parida2

  • 1Department of Anaesthesiology, Universal College of Medical Sciences, Bhairahawa, Nepal.

Insights

Carotid doppler indices like CABF, CFT, and DVPeakCA are unreliable for predicting fluid responsiveness in coronary artery bypass grafting patients. These non-invasive measures showed weak correlation with stroke volume index changes after fluid bolus.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Anesthesiology
  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Hemodynamic Monitoring

Background:

  • Fluid responsiveness assessment is crucial in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery.
  • Non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring is desirable to guide fluid therapy.
  • Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery requires careful hemodynamic management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the predictive value of carotid artery blood flow (CABF), corrected carotid flow time (CFT), and respiratory variation in carotid peak systolic velocity (DVPeakCA) for fluid responsiveness.
  • To correlate these carotid doppler indices with changes in stroke volume index (SVI) after fluid administration in CABG patients.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective, interventional, before-after study of 45 adult patients undergoing CABG.
  • A fluid challenge (6 mL/kg crystalloid) was administered over 10 minutes.
  • Hemodynamic parameters including CABF, CFT, and DVPeakCA were measured before and after the fluid bolus.

Main Results:

  • 22 patients (48.9%) were classified as fluid responders (SVI increase >15%).
  • Area under the ROC curves for CABF (0.516), CFT (0.502), and DVPeakCA (0.671) showed poor predictive value for fluid responsiveness.
  • Correlation coefficients (r) between carotid doppler indices and SVI changes were <0.2, indicating very weak correlations.

Conclusions:

  • Carotid doppler-derived indices (CABF, CFT, DVPeakCA) are unreliable for assessing fluid responsiveness in this patient population.
  • These non-invasive indices cannot replace invasive methods for preload optimization.
  • No significant correlation was found between carotid doppler indices and SVI alterations post-fluid bolus.
Abstract