The effect of population model choice and network topologies on extinction time patterns in dendritic ecological...

Models of populations in habitat networks are vital for understanding and linking processes and patterns across individuals, environments, ecological interactions, and population structures. River ecosystem models combine the physical structure of the networks with the biological processes of the organisms using structural and functional models, respectively. Previous studies on dendritic river networks have employed different functional (population) models and either directly claimed or implied that the results illustrate general properties of actual river systems. However, these studies have used different approaches and assumptions when modeling population characteristics and behavior, and it is possible that inferences regarding a system may vary based on the combination of functional model and the spatial structure of a network. This study aims to understand if different functional models in river systems produce substantially different model results and, therefore, whether conclusions are model-dependent. We compare variation in extinction time and occupancy proportion of river networks with linear, trellis, dendritic and ring-lattice topologies, using three population models (uniform, age-class and individual based) and one metapopulation-based (patch-occupancy) model. Dendritic, linear, and trellis structures did not show notable differences among extinction times for any of the four models. The difference between topologies was higher for the patch-occupancy model compared to the three population models. There were significant differences in the variations of patch-occupancy between the metapopulation and the population models, but the three population models of differing complexity produced broadly similar results. Therefore, if the occupancy data is obtained based on local subpopulations, spatial arrangement and connectivity does not appear to be the sole predictor of single-species metapopulation responses. We conclude that the outputs from functional models are robust to assumptions and varying levels of detail as long as they contain at least some detail at the level of individuals within habitat nodes. Also, if we are modeling network-scale populations, models that include at least some detailed information on individuals are a far better choice than considering populations implicitly.