Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.1K
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.4K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.4K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.9K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.9K
Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.5K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.5K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

1.4K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
1.4K
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials01:12

Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials

750
Statistical software is pivotal in data analysis and clinical trials by providing tools to analyze data, draw conclusions, and make predictions. These software packages range from simple data management applications to complex analytical platforms, supporting various statistical tests, models, and simulation techniques. Their significance lies in their ability to handle vast amounts of data with precision and efficiency, enabling researchers to validate hypotheses, identify trends, and make...
750

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Colchicine for Prevention of Perioperative Atrial Fibrillation and Myocardial Injury After Major Thoracic Surgery: Surgical Subgroup Analyses From the COP-AF Trial.

European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery·2026
Same author

Association Between Complications and Death Within 30 Days After Orthopedic Surgery: Vascular Events in Noncardiac Surgery Patients Cohort Evaluation (VISION) Substudy.

JMIR perioperative medicine·2026
Same author

Association between complications and mortality after cardiac surgery: Results from the Vascular Events in Surgery Patients Cohort Evaluation cardiac surgery prospective cohort study.

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same author

AI-Based Automation for Medication Reconciliation: Scoping Review.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

ASSOCIATION BETWEEN COMPLICATIONS AND DEATH WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY: A VASCULAR EVENTS IN NONCARDIAC SURGERY PATIENTS COHORT EVALUATION (VISION) SUBSTUDY.

JMIR perioperative medicine·2026
Same author

Safety and Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in Urologic Surgery: Results from the International, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled POISE-3 Trial.

European urology·2026
Same journal

The sequential cohort randomized clinical trial: A study design for community-engaged clinical research in a rural American Indian community.

Contemporary clinical trials·2026
Same journal

Rationale, design, and statistical analysis plan for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of Limosilactobacillus reuteri to support mother-infant bonding and maternal socioemotional functioning in postpartum women at increased risk for postpartum depression.

Contemporary clinical trials·2026
Same journal

Effectiveness of clinical trial recruitment strategies in a safety-net hospital.

Contemporary clinical trials·2026
Same journal

Are older adult research participants representative of the general population? Results from 19 clinical studies at one academic research center.

Contemporary clinical trials·2026
Same journal

Multi-site feasibility of a web-based and telephone navigation intervention to connect lung cancer caregivers in community oncology settings with resources: Protocol for the WF-2301CD Caregiver Oncology Needs Evaluation Tool (CONNECT) trial.

Contemporary clinical trials·2026
Same journal

Rationale and design of a CArdiac rehabilitation program on the prevention of CardioTOXicity in breast Cancer patients undergoing treatment with anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab (CARPTOX-BC) trial: A randomized, active control group, open-label trial.

Contemporary clinical trials·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 25, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K

Machine learning for detecting centre-level irregularities in randomized controlled trials: A pilot study.

Jeremy Petch1, Walter Nelson2, Shuang Di3

  • 1Centre for Data Science and Digital Health, Hamilton Health Sciences, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Canada; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Canada; Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Canada.

Contemporary Clinical Trials
|October 17, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This pilot study shows machine learning can detect irregularities in clinical trials. Unsupervised machine learning methods identified previously unseen patterns, offering a flexible alternative to traditional monitoring.

Keywords:
Anomaly detectionCentral statistical monitoringData irregularitiesMachine learning

More Related Videos

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
04:24

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program

Published on: April 19, 2019

11.7K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 25, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K
A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
04:24

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program

Published on: April 19, 2019

11.7K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.9K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials
  • Data Science
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Centralized statistical monitoring is an alternative to onsite monitoring for randomized control trials (RCTs).
  • Current methods are resource-intensive and struggle with novel irregularity patterns.
  • Machine learning (ML) has not been applied to detect irregularities in clinical trials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To pilot the use of unsupervised machine learning for detecting center-level irregularities in multicenter clinical trial data.
  • To develop a flexible ML approach capable of discovering novel irregularity patterns without prior labeling.
  • To evaluate the performance of ML-based irregularity detection against current centralized monitoring methods.

Main Methods:

  • Employed unsupervised ML to compute distance matrices between centers, generating continuous features.
  • Utilized a one-class support vector machine to model data distributions and identify outliers.
  • Evaluated the ML approach on two trials with known irregularities, comparing against existing automated methods.

Main Results:

  • The ML approach demonstrated superior performance in detecting irregularities on one trial (AUROC 0.728 vs. 0.140).
  • Current methods performed better on the other trial (AUROC 0.752 vs. 0.584 for ML).
  • Results indicate ML's feasibility and potential value for detecting novel irregularities in RCTs.

Conclusions:

  • Unsupervised machine learning shows promise for identifying center-level irregularities in clinical trials.
  • This approach offers automated discovery of previously unseen patterns, enhancing flexibility.
  • Further research is warranted to explore the full potential of ML in clinical trial monitoring.