Skipping the cord during laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suturing in children, is it reasonable?

Ergun Ergun1, Beytullah Yagiz2

  • 1Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ankara University, Dikimevi, 06100, Ankara, Turkey. drergunergun@gmail.com.

Insights

Skipping the peritoneum during laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suturing (PIRS) for pediatric inguinal hernias is safe. This technique avoids spermatic cord and vessel damage without increasing recurrence or complication rates.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric surgery
  • Minimally invasive procedures
  • Surgical techniques

Background:

  • Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children is a minimally invasive option.
  • Percutaneous internal ring suturing (PIRS) is a common technique.
  • Concerns exist regarding potential spermatic cord or testicular vessel damage during PIRS.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare recurrence and complication rates in pediatric inguinal hernia repair using PIRS.
  • To evaluate the impact of skipping the peritoneum over the spermatic cord and/or vessels.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of patient charts for laparoscopic PIRS repairs (2017-2021).
  • Video recording review to categorize hernias into 'skipped peritoneum' (Group 1) and 'not skipped' (Group 2).
  • Comparison of recurrence and complication rates between the two groups.

Main Results:

  • 101 boys underwent repair for 125 inguinal hernias.
  • Group 1 (skipped peritoneum) had 63 hernias; Group 2 (not skipped) had 62 hernias.
  • Both groups showed a 3% recurrence rate (2 cases each) with no other postoperative complications.

Conclusions:

  • Skipping the peritoneum during PIRS is a safe approach.
  • This technique effectively prevents spermatic cord and vessel damage.
  • The method does not elevate recurrence or complication risks in pediatric inguinal hernia repair.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos