Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

121
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
121
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

57.0K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
57.0K
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

61.4K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
61.4K
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

479
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
479
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.6K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.6K
Piaget's Stage 3 of Cognitive Development01:17

Piaget's Stage 3 of Cognitive Development

623
During Piaget's concrete operational stage, from ages 7 to 11, children exhibit a marked increase in logical thinking skills, specifically in relation to tangible, real-world events. This stage is characterized by the development of several essential cognitive concepts, including conservation, reversibility, and classification, all of which support the child's evolving capacity for structured thought.
Conservation and Constancy of Quantity
A significant cognitive milestone in the...
623

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Children across diverse societies exchange reasons to resolve disagreements.

Child development·2026
Same author

Digital Phenotyping via Passive Network Traffic Monitoring: Prospective Observational Study in University Students.

JMIR formative research·2026
Same author

Chimpanzees spontaneously prepare for mutually exclusive possibilities, and collective context strengthens this behaviour.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same author

EVApeCognition: An 18-Year Dataset of Great Ape Cognition.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Animal cumulative culture through changing environments.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same author

Digital Phenotyping via Passive Network Traffic Monitoring: Prospective Observational Study in University Students.

JMIR formative research·2026
Same journal

Timing and type of domestic violence exposure and adolescents' experiences of peer violence.

Child development·2026
Same journal

Comprehension of "can" predicts performance on a nonverbal measure of modal concepts at 48 but not 36 months.

Child development·2026
Same journal

An associative learning account of how saliva becomes a cue for comfort.

Child development·2026
Same journal

If moms do it, it can't be that important: Children's reasoning about gender disparities in domestic work.

Child development·2026
Same journal

Adapting under stress: How sociocultural stress intensity and fluctuation shape youth school engagement and internalizing symptoms.

Child development·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 25, 2025

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems
08:42

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems

Published on: May 5, 2015

12.2K

Do chimpanzees reason logically?

Jan M Engelmann1, Lou M Haux2, Christoph Völter3

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.

Child Development
|October 19, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Chimpanzees showed above-chance performance in a two-cup task, suggesting some logical reasoning abilities. However, they struggled with more complex tasks, indicating logical inference may not be fully developed in non-human primates.

More Related Videos

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.8K
Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates
16:00

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates

Published on: November 11, 2011

22.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 25, 2025

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems
08:42

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems

Published on: May 5, 2015

12.2K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.8K
Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates
16:00

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates

Published on: November 11, 2011

22.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Primate Behavior
  • Developmental Psychology

Background:

  • The development of logical reasoning, specifically concepts like 'or' and 'not', is debated among psychologists.
  • Some theories propose infants possess innate logical abilities, while others link logical inference to language development around age four.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate logical reasoning abilities in chimpanzees using tasks previously administered to children.
  • To compare chimpanzee performance on logical tasks with human developmental data.

Main Methods:

  • Five experiments were conducted on 16 adult chimpanzees (10 female, mean age 24 years).
  • Subjects participated in variations of the two-, three-, and four-cup tasks, commonly used to assess logical reasoning in children.

Main Results:

  • Chimpanzees performed significantly above chance in the two-cup task.
  • Performance did not exceed chance levels in the three-cup task.
  • In the four-cup task, chimpanzees selected the logically correct option more frequently in the test condition compared to the control condition.

Conclusions:

  • The findings suggest that chimpanzees exhibit some logical reasoning capabilities, particularly in simpler tasks.
  • Performance limitations in more complex tasks indicate that fully developed deductive reasoning may be absent or require further development.
  • The results are most consistent with non-deductive explanations of cognitive processes in chimpanzees.