Evaluation of Effectiveness of Graphics Interchange Format and Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale as Pain Assessment

Henpu Kamki1, Ritesh R Kalaskar2, Shruti Balasubramanian3

  • 1Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Government Dental College & Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India, Phone: +91 9436844585, e-mail: h.kamki@gmail.com, Orcid: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8150-4002.

Insights

The Graphics Interchange Format (GIF) pain scale is a promising tool for assessing children's pain. It demonstrates high validity and reliability, proving easier for children to understand than the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Dentistry
  • Pain Management
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Accurate pain assessment in children is crucial for effective treatment.
  • Existing self-report pain scales may have limitations in terms of validity and ease of understanding.
  • The Graphics Interchange Format (GIF) pain scale is a novel tool developed for pediatric pain assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the validity and reliability of the GIF pain scale as a self-reporting tool for children.
  • To compare the GIF pain scale with the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (WBFPRS).
  • To assess children's preference and ease of understanding between the two pain scales.

Main Methods:

  • An observational study involving 42 children (aged 7-13) with dental pain.
  • Administration of both the GIF pain scale and the WBFPRS by a single practitioner.
  • A subsequent questionnaire to gather children's feedback on the usability of each scale.

Main Results:

  • The GIF pain scale demonstrated a very strong relationship (r=0.936) and almost perfect agreement (k=0.911) with actual pain intensity.
  • The WBFPRS showed a strong relationship (r=0.725) and substantial agreement (k=0.710).
  • Children found the GIF pain scale significantly easier to understand than the WBFPRS.

Conclusions:

  • The GIF pain scale is a highly valid and reliable tool for self-reported pain assessment in children.
  • The GIF pain scale appears to be a more user-friendly alternative to the WBFPRS for pediatric populations.
  • Further research is recommended to refine and expand the application of the GIF pain scale.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos