Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2025

X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging
Published on: September 11, 2011
Study of the performance change in digital mammography systems depending on the total number of examinations
Melike Kaya Karaaslan1, Nedim Muzoğlu2, Özcan Gündoğdu1
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Kocaeli, Kocaeli 41001, Turkey.
Abstract:
Digital mammography equipment should operate at a high-performance level for detecting breast cancer over the lifetime of the systems. This study investigates the performance of the Fujifilm Amulet Innovality full-field digital mammography system in relation to the number of exposures. The performance of twelve systems, from new and up to 17 000 examinations, was compared. The x-ray output, half-value layer (HVL), contrast-detail (C-D) detectability, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), mean glandular dose (MGD), signal transfer property (STP), pre-sampled modulation transfer function (MTF), normalized noise power spectra (NNPS), detective quantum efficiency (DQE) tests were performed to determine the performance change. The noise sources were also analyzed in the spatial domain. The x-ray output and HVL values at 28 kV with tungsten anode and rhodium filter were 15μGy/mAs ± 1.0 (coefficient of variation (cov) = 7.0%) and 0.54 mmAl ± 0.008 (cov = 1.5%), respectively. The average MGDs for 60 mm equivalent breast to reach the achievable image quality level for 0.1 mm and 0.25 mm detail diameters of circular discs on the CDMAM 3.4 phantom image were 1.17 mGy ± 0.13 (cov = 11%) and 1.40 mGy ± 0.09 (cov = 6%), respectively. The average MGD for 53 mm equivalent breast was 1.08 mGy ± 0.14 (cov = 13%) at dose setting Normal in automatic exposure control (AEC) mode. All tested devices demonstrated good linearity with R2 ≥ 0.999 in the STP curves. The average MTF at 5.0 mm-1spatial frequency was 0.66 ± 0.007 (cov = 1.0%). The average NNPS was 2.38 × 10-6mm2 ± 2.13 × 10-7(cov = 9.0%) at 5.0 mm-1. The average DQE value at 5.0 mm-1was 0.33 ± 0.02 (cov = 5.0%), and the mean peak DQE was 0.66 ± 0.03 (cov = 5.0%). The mean power coefficient (b), determined from the power relationship between linearised standard deviation and detector dose while analyzing noise sources, was 0.49 ± 0.007 (cov = 1.4%). There was no gradual change in the x-ray tube and detector performance by the number of exposures, and taking up to 68 000 images did not decrease the quality of the systems.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography

