Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2025

Semi-Automated Analysis of Peak Amplitude and Latency for Auditory Brainstem Response Waveforms Using R
Published on: December 9, 2022
Latency and Interpeak Interval Values of Auditory Brainstem Response in 73 Individuals with Normal Hearing
Milaine Dominici Sanfins1,2, Maria Francisca Colella-Santos3, Natalia Ferrazoli4
1Department of Electrophysiology, Albert Einstein Israelita Institute of Education and Research, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Abstract:
BACKGROUND Auditory brainstem response (ABR) potential is important for audiological diagnosis, reflecting the integrity of the structures of the auditory system up to the brainstem. The click stimulus is the best known and is most used in clinical practice. However, different devices and examiners may yield distinct results, and each institution tends to use its own parameters. We aimed to analyze the latency values of wave I, III, V, and interpeak intervals I-III, III-V, I-V values obtained in assessing ABR using a new device. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a cross-sectional study of 73 participants with normal hearing thresholds and no hearing problems. All underwent basic audiological (air and bone conduction, Speech Recognition Threshold, Speech Recognition Index, acoustic reflex, and tympanometry) and electrophysiological evaluation (ABR assessment). RESULTS Absolute latency and interpeak values from ABR showed earlier responses in women, faster than international standards suggest. The responses were similar to other studies carried out previously, with the exception of wave I values, which were a little earlier in females. CONCLUSIONS We assessed normative data from measurement of latency values of wave I, III, V, and interpeak intervals I-III, III-V, and I-V applying 2 standard deviations in the assessment of ABR using the new Neuro-Audio/ABR device created by Neurosoft.

