Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Coronary Artery Revascularization
Published on: September 15, 2023
Complete Versus Incomplete Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Mediated Revascularization in Patients With Chronic
Rahul Kurup1, Harindra C Wijeysundera2, Rodrigo Bagur1
1Chronic Total Occlusion Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Insights
Completeness of revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) is debated, especially for chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). This review clarifies definitions and summarizes evidence on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-mediated complete revascularization (CR) outcomes in CCS patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) is linked to poorer patient outcomes.
- The impact of complete revascularization (CR) on prognosis, particularly in chronic coronary syndromes (CCS), is debated.
- Inconsistent definitions of CR and incomplete revascularization (ICR), limited randomized data, and varied methodologies contribute to this uncertainty.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and clarify the definitions of CR versus ICR in CAD.
- To outline the rationale for achieving CR in CAD patients.
- To summarize existing literature on the clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-mediated CR in CCS patients.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of studies defining and assessing CR and ICR.
- Analysis of evidence pertaining to PCI-mediated CR in CCS.
- Synthesis of data on clinical outcomes associated with CR versus ICR.
Main Results:
- The current literature presents varied definitions for CR and ICR, complicating direct comparisons.
- Evidence regarding the specific benefits of PCI-mediated CR for CCS patients remains limited and requires further investigation.
- Heterogeneity in study populations and revascularization techniques affects the interpretation of existing data.
Conclusions:
- Standardized definitions for CR and ICR are crucial for advancing research in multivessel CAD.
- Further high-quality clinical data, particularly from randomized trials, are needed to establish the definitive role of PCI-mediated CR in CCS.
- Clarifying the effectiveness of PCI-mediated CR is essential for optimizing treatment strategies in patients with chronic coronary syndromes.
Abstract:
Multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) is associated with worse outcomes across the spectrum of clinical presentations. The prognostic implications of completeness of revascularization in CAD patients, especially those with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS), remain highly debated. This is largely due to the use of non-standardized definitions for complete revascularization (CR) and incomplete revascularization (ICR) within previously published studies, lack of randomized clinical data, varying revascularization methods and heterogenous study populations. In particular, the utility and effectiveness of PCI-mediated CR for CCS remains unknown. In this review, we discuss the various definitions used for CR vs. ICR, highlight the rationale for pursuing CR and summarise the current literature regarding the effects of PCI-mediated CR on clinical outcomes in patients with CCS.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations

