Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2025
Using the Electroretinogram to Assess Function in the Rodent Retina and the Protective Effects of Remote Limb Ischemic Preconditioning
Published on: June 9, 2015
Modulation of flash ERGs by dynamic backgrounds
Jan Kremers1, Avinash J Aher2, Cord Huchzermeyer2
1Experimental Ophthalmology, Section for Retinal Physiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. Jan.kremers@uk-erlangen.de.
Purpose:
The aim of this study was to characterize the signal processing mechanisms that lead to an ERG response and to use this characterization for obtaining more robust responses in patients who display feeble responses with standard recordings. We studied the influence of sinusoidally modulating backgrounds on flash ERGs and the relationship between the ERG components' amplitudes and the momentary Weber fraction of the flash stimulus.
Methods:
ERG recordings were performed in nine healthy subjects and three RP patients. In four normal subjects, we measured the response to flashes (500 cd/m2, 1 ms duration) on a steady background (50 cd/m2) and on a sine wave (50 cd/m2 mean luminance) modulating background at 1, 5, 10, and 25 Hz temporal frequencies. The flashes were delivered at eight different phases (0-315° in a step of 45°) during the modulating background sine wave. The responses to the backgrounds were also recorded and subtracted from the responses to flash plus modulating backgrounds to obtain the flash ERGs at the different phases. The recordings in the remaining five normal subjects and the RP patients were performed with a subset of these stimuli.
Results:
The flash ERGs were strongly modulated by the backgrounds particularly at low frequencies and were enhanced when the momentary Weber fraction was large. The amplitudes of the components could be described by the Weber fraction plus a saturating nonlinearity and a delay in the processing of background luminance. The strength of the modulation decreased with increasing peak time of the component. Furthermore the background luminance delay was positively correlated with the peak time. The effect was also present in RP patients.
Conclusions:
A sine wave background of about 1 Hz can be used to enhance ERG responses. Weber fraction of the flashes is an adequate quantification of stimulus for describing the amplitudes of the ERGs. The data provide basic information on how background luminance is processed in ERG generating mechanisms. The response enhancement can be used in clinical applications to obtain a more robust comparison between normal and patient data.
