Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2025

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients
Published on: December 16, 2022
Brain age predicts long-term recovery in post-stroke aphasia
Sigfus Kristinsson1, Natalie Busby1, Christopher Rorden1,2
1Center for the Study of Aphasia Recovery, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Brain age, a measure of brain structural integrity, predicts language function and recovery after stroke. Accelerated brain age at stroke onset correlates with worse language outcomes, while decelerated brain age is linked to improved recovery.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimaging
- Neurology
- Computational neuroscience
Background:
- The relationship between chronological age and post-stroke language recovery is not fully understood.
- Brain age, derived from neuroimaging, offers a potential biomarker for brain structural integrity.
- Investigating brain age's role in language outcomes can refine stroke recovery predictions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the association between brain age at stroke onset and cross-sectional language performance.
- To determine if brain age predicts longitudinal language recovery post-stroke.
- To compare the predictive power of brain age versus chronological age for language outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Utilized neuroimaging (T1 scans) from 49 left hemisphere stroke patients to estimate brain age using a machine learning algorithm.
- Assessed language performance at stroke onset using the Bedside Evaluation Screening Test-2.
- Analyzed longitudinal language data from 30 participants at least 2 years post-stroke, calculating proportional brain age difference.
Main Results:
- Accelerated brain age was significantly associated with worse aphasia severity, naming, and speech repetition at stroke onset.
- Decelerated brain age correlated with reduced overall aphasia severity at follow-up (≥2 years post-stroke).
- Chronological age only predicted naming performance at stroke onset; brain age showed broader associations with language function and recovery.
Conclusions:
- Brain age is a robust biomarker for predicting language function and recovery following stroke.
- Routine clinical neuroimaging can provide valuable insights into post-stroke language prognosis.
- Brain age estimation offers a more comprehensive understanding of age-related factors in stroke recovery than chronological age alone.
More Related Videos
09:45Motor and Hippocampal Dependent Spatial Learning and Reference Memory Assessment in a Transgenic Rat Model of Alzheimer's Disease with Stroke
Published on: March 22, 2016
10:15Utilizing Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Improve Language Function in Stroke Patients with Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia
Published on: July 2, 2013