Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Microglial clonal dynamics and the impact of clonal hematopoiesis in autologously transplanted rhesus macaques.

Cell reports·2026
Same author

Clonal dynamics, tolerance, and adverse events after CD45-ADC-conditioned autologous HSPC transplantation in macaques.

Blood advances·2026
Same author

Multicenter study on the versatility and adoption of AI-driven automated radiotherapy planning across cancer types.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Regionally modulated radiomics analysis in PET/CT imaging: application to prognosis prediction of head and neck cancer.

Physical and engineering sciences in medicine·2025
Same author

Lineage bias in hematopoietic stem cells: more niche or intrinsic factors?

Haematologica·2025
Same author

Dosimetric study of TrueBeam single-isocenter vs. Halcyon dual-isocenter VMAT radiotherapy plans for postoperative left-sided breast cancer.

BMC cancer·2025
Same journal

Explainable incremental-value analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient and arterial spin labeling radiomics for ATRX status prediction in glioblastoma.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same journal

Study-level factors associated with hematoma after ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted breast lesion excision: a systematic review and meta-analysis using a T-P-B framework.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same journal

Feasibility and strategy analysis of radiotherapy consolidation following immunotherapy for stage IV esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same journal

Anastomosing hemangioma of the kidney: a case report.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same journal

Machine learning-based prediction of prolonged air leak after uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery segmentectomy.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same journal

Past present and future of radiosensitization in cervical cancer.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 24, 2025

In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography
07:44

In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography

Published on: July 24, 2020

3.0K

Setup error assessment based on "Sphere-Mask" Optical Positioning System: Results from a multicenter study.

Yan Zhang1, Han Zhou1, Kaiyue Chu2

  • 1School of Electronic Science and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.

Frontiers in Oncology
|October 21, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Sphere-Mask Optical Positioning System (S-M_OPS) significantly enhances radiation therapy setup accuracy and stability compared to laser lines. This system offers comparable accuracy to cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) but in a fraction of the time.

Keywords:
CBCTS-M_OPSlaser lineradiotherapysetup

More Related Videos

Using an Automated Hirschberg Test App to Evaluate Ocular Alignment
05:40

Using an Automated Hirschberg Test App to Evaluate Ocular Alignment

Published on: March 24, 2020

12.4K
Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery
05:12

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery

Published on: August 12, 2021

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 24, 2025

In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography
07:44

In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography

Published on: July 24, 2020

3.0K
Using an Automated Hirschberg Test App to Evaluate Ocular Alignment
05:40

Using an Automated Hirschberg Test App to Evaluate Ocular Alignment

Published on: March 24, 2020

12.4K
Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery
05:12

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery

Published on: August 12, 2021

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Image-Guided Therapy

Background:

  • Accurate patient setup is critical for effective tumor local control in radiation therapy.
  • Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) requires precise positioning to target tumors while sparing healthy tissues.
  • Traditional setup methods may lack the speed and accuracy needed for modern radiation oncology workflows.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility and performance of the Sphere-Mask Optical Positioning System (S-M_OPS) for radiation therapy patient setup.
  • To compare the accuracy and efficiency of S-M_OPS with established setup techniques, including laser lines and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective analysis of 15,441 IMRT fractions across 1,981 patients treated between 2016 and 2021 using S-M_OPS.
  • Direct comparison of setup accuracy and time using S-M_OPS, laser lines, and CBCT in 277 co-setup fractions, with CBCT serving as the gold standard.
  • Data collected included registration time, mask deformation, and setup errors in lateral, vertical, and longitudinal directions.

Main Results:

  • S-M_OPS-guided setup was significantly faster (7.47s) than laser line-guided setup (31.75s) and CBCT-guided setup (228.84s).
  • S-M_OPS demonstrated improved accuracy, with smaller mean setup errors (e.g., 0.12±1.91mm laterally) and narrower 95% confidence intervals compared to laser line guidance.
  • Laser line-guided setup showed higher deviation rates (>2mm: 12.8%, >3mm: 5.2%).

Conclusions:

  • The Sphere-Mask Optical Positioning System (S-M_OPS) offers a substantial improvement in patient setup accuracy and stability over traditional laser line methods.
  • S-M_OPS provides setup accuracy comparable to CBCT, achieving this in considerably less time, enhancing efficiency in radiation therapy.
  • The system is feasible for fast and accurate patient positioning in various cancer sites treated with IMRT.