Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2025

The Use of an Automated System GreenFeed to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals
Published on: September 7, 2015
Phenotypic relationship and repeatability of methane emissions and performance traits in beef cattle using a
Clodagh V Ryan1,2, Thierry Pabiou1, Deirdre C Purfield2
1Irish Cattle Breeding Federation, Ballincollig, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Reducing methane emissions in cattle may negatively impact growth and body composition. Residual methane, adjusted for dry matter intake and liveweight, is a preferred trait for breeding programs aiming to lower greenhouse gas output.
Area of Science:
- Animal Science
- Environmental Science
- Agricultural Science
Background:
- Rumen methanogenesis in cattle is a major source of anthropogenic methane (CH4) emissions, representing a significant loss of gross energy intake.
- Understanding the relationship between greenhouse gas emissions and production traits is crucial for sustainable beef production.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze greenhouse gas traits in a commercial feedlot setting.
- To investigate the relationships between methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and production traits in beef cattle.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from 1,099 beef production animals (steers, heifers, bulls) including GreenFeed Emission Monitoring (GEM) system data for CH4 and CO2, feed intake, live weight, ultrasound, and carcass data.
- Assessed phenotypic relationships between GEM measurements and production traits, daily emission patterns, and measurement repeatability.
- Analyzed methane concentrations based on visit number, duration, and time of day.
Main Results:
- Mean CH4 emissions varied by sex: steers (256.1 g/day), heifers (234.7 g/day), and young bulls (156.9 g/day).
- Heavier animals exhibited higher CH4 (correlation = 0.30) and CO2 (correlation = 0.61) production; higher dry matter intake correlated with higher CH4 output (correlation = 0.31).
- A 10-day GEM measurement average was needed for steers and heifers to achieve 0.60 repeatability, while CO2 repeatability exceeded 0.6 with >2-day averages.
Conclusions:
- Reducing CH4 emissions may adversely affect cattle growth and body composition.
- Methane ratio traits are not ideal for breeding due to unpredictable responses.
- Residual CH4 (adjusted for dry matter intake and liveweight) is a recommended alternative trait for breeding goals focused on emission reduction.
More Related Videos
08:29Measuring Liver Mitochondrial Oxygen Consumption and Proton Leak Kinetics to Estimate Mitochondrial Respiration in Holstein Dairy Cattle
Published on: November 30, 2018
06:52Lab-Scale Model to Evaluate Odor and Gas Concentrations Emitted by Deep Bedded Pack Manure
Published on: July 19, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Production Efficiency
Light Acquisition