Related Experiment Video For Cholangiocarcinoma
Updated: Aug 24, 2025
Dual-phase Cone-beam Computed Tomography to See, Reach, and Treat Hepatocellular Carcinoma during Drug-eluting Beads Transarterial Chemo-embolization
Published on: December 2, 2013
Dual-energy CT based material decomposition to differentiate intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular
Scherwin Mahmoudi1, Simon Bernatz1, Friederike C Althoff2
1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Purpose:
To assess the potential of material decomposition in dual-energy CT (DECT) to differentiate intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Method:
In this retrospective study, we included 94 patients (26 female (27.7 %), median age 64.5 (interquartile range 55.5-74.5) years) with either iCCA or HCC who underwent abdominal contrast-enhanced DECT in arterial phase. To test for differences between iCCA (n = 47) and HCC (n = 47), we evaluated mean attenuation and DECT material density values including iodine density (ID), normalized iodine uptake (NIU), fat fraction, and lesion-to-liver parenchyma ratio. Histopathology served as reference standard for all lesions. We used univariate logistic regression models for the outcome iCCA versus HCC. ROC curve analysis was applied to assess discriminative ability of the model. Model accuracy was evaluated by calculating the Brier score. Youden index was applied to establish thresholds to differentiate between iCCA and HCC.
Results:
Comparison of quantitative image parameters revealed significant differences between iCCA and HCC for ID (1.6 ± 0.5 mg/ml vs 2.8 ± 0.8 mg/ml, p < 0.001), NIU (14.5 ± 4.8 vs 24.8 ± 10.3, p < 0.001), attenuation (41.9 ± 10.1 HU vs 47.9 ± 8.9 HU, p = 0.003), and fat fraction (12.0 ± 7.8 % vs 9.0 ± 6.4 %, p = 0.045). ROC curve analysis revealed highest ability to differentiate iCCA from HCC for ID (AUC = 0.93, 95 % CI 0.89-0.98). For ID, an optimal threshold of 2.33 mg/dl was determined to discriminate between iCCA and HCC (sensitivity 89.4 %, specificity 76.6 %).
Conclusions:
DECT-based iodine quantification can serve as a tool for the differentiation of iCCA and HCC in contrast-enhanced CT. ID yielded the highest diagnostic performance and may assist in clinical routine CT diagnostics.
