Related Experiment Videos
Intravenous sedation in dental surgery
Middle East Journal of Anaesthesiology
|June 1, 1987
Summary
This study compared diazepam and midazolam for intravenous sedation in dental surgery. Midazolam provided better amnesia and fewer venous complications than diazepam.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Intravenous sedation is frequently used in dental surgery.
- Diazepam and midazolam are commonly used sedatives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of diazepam-fentanyl versus midazolam-fentanyl for intravenous sedation in dental procedures.
- To evaluate cardiovascular effects, anterograde amnesia, and venous sequelae.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 180 patients undergoing dental surgery.
- 120 patients received diazepam and fentanyl.
- 60 patients received midazolam and fentanyl.
Main Results:
- Both sedation regimens were safe and effective.
- The diazepam group experienced more adverse venous sequelae.
- The midazolam group demonstrated superior anterograde amnesia and had no venous sequelae.
Conclusions:
- Midazolam-fentanyl is a preferable sedation option in dental surgery due to improved amnesia and reduced venous complications.
- Both diazepam and midazolam offer acceptable sedation, but midazolam presents a better safety profile regarding venous sequelae.