Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Patient and public involvement in an international rheumatology translational research project: an evaluation
Savia de Souza1, Eva C Johansson2, Susanne Karlfeldt3
1Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, SE5 9RJ, UK. savia.desouza@outlook.com.
Background:
Rheuma Tolerance for Cure (RTCure) is a five-year international collaboration between academia, industry and patients/members of the public. It focuses on developing approaches to predict the onset of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and designing clinical trials to reduce the risk of disease development through immune-tolerising and other treatments. We conducted a mid-term evaluation of patient and public involvement (PPI) within the project.
Methods:
Two surveys on PPI were co-designed by the PPI Coordinator, Patient/Public Research Partners (PRPs) and a researcher. Both anonymous, electronic surveys were distributed to 61 researchers and 9 PRPs. Quantitative survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics and free text responses underwent inductive thematic analysis.
Results:
Researcher and Patient response rates were 33% and 78%, respectively. Quantitative Researcher Survey data highlighted that (i) responding researchers represented all seven Work Packages (WPs), (ii) 40% thought PRPs had made a large or extremely large contribution to their own WPs, (iii) 55% thought PPI has had a moderate or large impact on RTCure, (iv) 75% worked with PRPs in RTCure, and (v) 60% said PRPs had affected their research thinking. Quantitative PRP Survey data highlighted that (i) PRPs were most involved in four WPs, (ii) 43% thought they had made a minor contribution to their main WP, (iii) 57% thought PPI has had a small impact on RTCure, and (iv) 57% thought they received too little feedback on the outcome of their contribution to different tasks. Four main themes were identified in both surveys: 'PRP contributions', 'Experiences of PPI', 'Impact of PPI on RTCure', and 'How PPI can be improved'. Two additional themes from the Researcher Survey were 'Impact of PPI on researchers' and 'Influence on Future Projects', and from the PRP Survey were 'Impact of PPI on PRPs' and 'Engagement with PRPs'.
Conclusion:
PPI seemed to have a significant impact on RTCure, however, PRPs were less aware. A focus on improving communication between PRPs and researchers (facilitated by the PPI Coordinator), and providing PPI training for researchers is likely to improve involvement. Complex legal agreements for PRPs should be avoided and careful attention paid to appropriate PRP compensation.
Insights
Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) significantly impacted the Rheuma Tolerance for Cure (RTCure) project, though patient partners felt their contributions were less recognized. Improving communication and training can enhance future collaboration in rheumatoid arthritis research.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Immunology
- Clinical Trial Design
Background:
- RTCure is an international collaboration focused on predicting rheumatoid arthritis (RA) onset.
- The project aims to design clinical trials for early intervention using immune-tolerizing treatments.
- A mid-term evaluation assessed patient and public involvement (PPI) within RTCure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness and impact of patient and public involvement (PPI) in the RTCure project.
- To identify areas for improvement in PPI within a large-scale international research collaboration.
- To understand the perspectives of both researchers and patient/public research partners (PRPs) on PPI.
Main Methods:
- Co-designed electronic surveys for researchers and PRPs.
- Anonymous surveys distributed to 61 researchers and 9 PRPs.
- Quantitative data analyzed using descriptive statistics; free-text responses underwent thematic analysis.
Main Results:
- Researcher response rate: 33%; PRP response rate: 78%.
- Researchers perceived a moderate to large impact of PPI (55%) and acknowledged its effect on their thinking (60%).
- PRPs perceived a smaller impact (57%) and felt they received insufficient feedback (57%).
- Key themes included PRP contributions, PPI experiences, impact on RTCure, and suggestions for improvement.
Conclusions:
- PPI demonstrated a significant impact on the RTCure project, though awareness varied between researchers and PRPs.
- Recommendations include enhancing communication between PRPs and researchers, providing PPI training for researchers, simplifying legal agreements, and ensuring appropriate PRP compensation.
- These improvements are expected to foster more effective PPI in future research endeavors.
More Related Videos
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
04:50Preliminary Study on Acupuncture Combined with Grain-sized Moxibustion for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis with Finger Joint Pain
Published on: May 16, 2025