Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Obstetric-gynecologic academic manpower--1986.

W H Pearse, J G Fielden, D M Sherline

    Obstetrics and Gynecology
    |September 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A Case of Gout.

    British medical journal·2010
    Same author

    Effect of gender on the obstetric-gynecologic work force.

    Obstetrics and gynecology·2001
    Same author

    Workforce projections for subspecialists in obstetrics and gynecology.

    Obstetrics and gynecology·2000
    Same author

    A blueprint for academic obstetrics and gynecology.

    Obstetrics and gynecology·1998
    Same author

    Unengaged vertex in nulliparous women in active labor. A risk factor for cesarean delivery.

    The Journal of reproductive medicine·1998
    Same author

    Modeling the future workforce of obstetrics and gynecology.

    Obstetrics and gynecology·1998

    Full-time obstetrics-gynecology faculty numbers are growing, with more women represented than in practice. Subspecialists are increasing but favor practice over academia, with significant faculty research involvement and predicted future growth.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Education
    • Reproductive Health
    • Academic Medicine

    Background:

    • Faculty numbers in obstetrics-gynecology academic departments have shown recent growth.
    • The representation of women in faculty positions is increasing compared to practicing specialists.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze current trends in obstetrics-gynecology faculty demographics and research involvement.
    • To project future growth in faculty positions and research within academic departments.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of full-time faculty numbers in academic obstetrics-gynecology departments.
    • Assessment of gender distribution within faculty and comparison to practicing specialists.
    • Evaluation of subspecialist trends and research participation among MD faculty.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Average full-time faculty numbers have reached 18.3 per department.
    • Women constitute a larger proportion of faculty than practicing specialists.
    • Faculty subspecialists are increasing but are more inclined towards practice than academic roles.
    • Research involves 61% of the MD faculty.

    Conclusions:

    • Academic obstetrics-gynecology departments are experiencing faculty growth, with increased female representation.
    • A shift towards practice is observed among subspecialists, despite overall faculty increases.
    • Significant faculty research engagement and optimistic predictions for future expansion in faculty and research are noted.