Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Hearing01:31

Hearing

52.9K
When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.
52.9K
The Cochlea01:13

The Cochlea

45.7K
The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.
45.7K
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

395
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
395
Hair Cells01:22

Hair Cells

41.1K
Hair cells are the sensory receptors of the auditory system—they transduce mechanical sound waves into electrical energy that the nervous system can understand. Hair cells are located in the organ of Corti within the cochlea of the inner ear, between the basilar and tectorial membranes. The actual sensory receptors are called inner hair cells. The outer hair cells serve other functions, such as sound amplification in the cochlea, and are not discussed in detail here.
41.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The needs of informal caregivers of people experiencing dementia as identified on social media.

Aging & mental health·2025
Same author

Effects of Sound Quality on the Accuracy of Telephone Captions Produced by Automatic Speech Recognition: A Preliminary Investigation.

American journal of audiology·2022
Same author

Evaluating the Performance of Transformer-based Language Models for Neuroatypical Language.

Proceedings of COLING. International Conference on Computational Linguistics·2022
Same author

Predicting pragmatic discourse features in the language of adults with autism spectrum disorder.

Proceedings of the conference. Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting·2022
Same author

Automated Scoring of Tablet-Administered Expressive Language Tests.

Frontiers in psychology·2021
Same author

Graph-Based Word Alignment for Clinical Language Evaluation.

Computational linguistics (Association for Computational Linguistics)·2021
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 24, 2025

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

459

Phoneme Categorization in Prelingually Deaf Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Joseph Bochner1, Vincent Samar1, Emily Prud'hommeaux2

  • 1National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Rochester Institute of Technology, NY.

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR
|October 24, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cochlear implantation before age 4 improves phoneme categorization (PC) skills in children with hearing loss. Early implantation aids speech recognition, even with less optimal PC performance.

More Related Videos

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
09:06

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

14.1K
Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
11:39

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

2.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 24, 2025

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

459
Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
09:06

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

14.1K
Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
11:39

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

2.2K

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Speech Perception
  • Cochlear Implantation

Background:

  • Phoneme categorization (PC) is crucial for speech understanding.
  • Cochlear implants (CIs) aim to restore hearing for individuals with severe to profound hearing loss.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate phoneme categorization abilities in adult cochlear implant (CI) users with varying implantation ages.
  • To compare PC performance between early (<4 years) and late (>7 years) implanted CI users and hearing controls.

Main Methods:

  • Administered identification and discrimination tasks to assess PC.
  • Analyzed data using principal component analysis to identify key performance factors.
  • Correlated implantation age and PC performance with speech recognition outcomes.

Main Results:

  • CI users showed generally poorer PC performance than hearing controls.
  • Earlier CI implantation age correlated with better PC performance in the early implanted group.
  • PC performance and implantation age had differential associations with speech recognition in early vs. late CI groups.

Conclusions:

  • Implantation timing within the sensitive period (before 4 years) significantly impacts PC development.
  • Early implantation may foster compensatory mechanisms for speech recognition, irrespective of PC proficiency.