Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Defining preferences over framed outcomes does not secure agents' rationality
1Department of Philosophy, University of Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria sarah.fisher@univie.ac.athttps://sites.google.com/view/sarahafisher/.
Abstract:
Bermúdez claims that agents think about framed outcomes, not outcomes themselves; and that seemingly incoherent preferences can be rational, once defined over framed outcomes. However, the agents in his examples know that alternative frames describe the same outcome, neutrally understood. This undermines the restriction of their preferences to framed outcomes and, in turn, the argument for rational framing effects.
Related Concept Videos
Framing Effects
Reason and Intuition
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

