Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2025

A Training and Testing System for Performing Vascular Reconstruction In Vitro
Published on: October 26, 2019
Capturing fine-grained details for video-based automation of suturing skills assessment
Andrew J Hung1, Richard Bao2, Idris O Sunmola3
1Center for Robotic Simulation & Education, Catherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, University of Southern California Institute of Urology, 1441 Eastlake Avenue Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA. Andrew.Hung@med.usc.edu.
Objectives:
Manually-collected suturing technical skill scores are strong predictors of continence recovery after robotic radical prostatectomy. Herein, we automate suturing technical skill scoring through computer vision (CV) methods as a scalable method to provide feedback.
Methods:
Twenty-two surgeons completed a suturing exercise three times on the Mimic™ Flex VR simulator. Instrument kinematic data (XYZ coordinates of each instrument and pose) were captured at 30 Hz. After standardized training, three human raters manually video segmented suturing task into four sub-stitch phases (Needle handling, Needle targeting, Needle driving, Needle withdrawal) and labeled the corresponding technical skill domains (Needle positioning, Needle entry, Needle driving, and Needle withdrawal). The CV framework extracted RGB features and optical flow frames using a pre-trained AlexNet. Additional CV strategies including auxiliary supervision (using kinematic data during training only) and attention mechanisms were implemented to improve performance.
Results:
This study included data from 15 expert surgeons (median caseload 300 [IQR 165-750]) and 7 training surgeons (0 [IQR 0-8]). In all, 226 virtual sutures were captured. Automated assessments for Needle positioning performed best with the simplest approach (1 s video; AUC 0.749). Remaining skill domains exhibited improvements with the implementation of auxiliary supervision and attention mechanisms when deployed separately (AUC 0.604-0.794). All techniques combined produced the best performance, particularly for Needle driving and Needle withdrawal (AUC 0.959 and 0.879, respectively).
Conclusions:
This study demonstrated the best performance of automated suturing technical skills assessment to date using advanced CV techniques. Future work will determine if a "human in the loop" is necessary to verify surgeon evaluations.

