Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2025

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
Published on: May 23, 2019
Visuomotor Mismatch Responses as a Hallmark of Explaining Away in Causal Inference
Fabian A Mikulasch1, Lucas Rudelt2, Viola Priesemann3,4,5
1Max-Planck-Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Göttingen 37077, Germany fabian.mikulasch@ds.mpg.de.
Abstract:
How are visuomotor mismatch responses in primary visual cortex embedded into cortical processing? We here show that mismatch responses can be understood as the result of a cooperation of motor and visual areas to jointly explain optic flow. This cooperation requires that optic flow is not explained redundantly by both areas, meaning that optic flow inputs to V1 that are predictable from motor neurons should be canceled (i.e., explained away). As a result, neurons in V1 represent only external causes of optic flow, which could allow the animal to easily detect movements that are independent of its own locomotion. We implement the proposed model in a spiking neural network, where coding errors are computed in dendrites and synaptic weights are learned with voltage-dependent plasticity rules. We find that both positive and negative mismatch responses arise, providing an alternative to the prevailing idea that visuomotor mismatch responses are linked to dedicated neurons for error computation. These results also provide a new perspective on several other recent observations of cross-modal neural interactions in cortex.
Related Concept Videos
Causality in Epidemiology
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Fundamental Attribution Error
Hindsight Biases
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Bias in Epidemiological Studies

