Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2025

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
Published on: September 20, 2018
Evaluating the Impact on Clinical Task Efficiency of a Natural Language Processing Algorithm for Searching Medical
Eunsoo H Park1,2, Hannah I Watson2, Felicity V Mehendale3
1Edinburgh Medical School, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Background:
Information retrieval (IR) from the free text within electronic health records (EHRs) is time consuming and complex. We hypothesize that natural language processing (NLP)-enhanced search functionality for EHRs can make clinical workflows more efficient and reduce cognitive load for clinicians.
Objective:
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 3 levels of search functionality (no search, string search, and NLP-enhanced search) in supporting IR for clinical users from the free text of EHR documents in a simulated clinical environment.
Methods:
A clinical environment was simulated by uploading 3 sets of patient notes into an EHR research software application and presenting these alongside 3 corresponding IR tasks. Tasks contained a mixture of multiple-choice and free-text questions. A prospective crossover study design was used, for which 3 groups of evaluators were recruited, which comprised doctors (n=19) and medical students (n=16). Evaluators performed the 3 tasks using each of the search functionalities in an order in accordance with their randomly assigned group. The speed and accuracy of task completion were measured and analyzed, and user perceptions of NLP-enhanced search were reviewed in a feedback survey.
Results:
NLP-enhanced search facilitated more accurate task completion than both string search (5.14%; P=.02) and no search (5.13%; P=.08). NLP-enhanced search and string search facilitated similar task speeds, both showing an increase in speed compared to the no search function, by 11.5% (P=.008) and 16.0% (P=.007) respectively. Overall, 93% of evaluators agreed that NLP-enhanced search would make clinical workflows more efficient than string search, with qualitative feedback reporting that NLP-enhanced search reduced cognitive load.
Conclusions:
To the best of our knowledge, this study is the largest evaluation to date of different search functionalities for supporting target clinical users in realistic clinical workflows, with a 3-way prospective crossover study design. NLP-enhanced search improved both accuracy and speed of clinical EHR IR tasks compared to browsing clinical notes without search. NLP-enhanced search improved accuracy and reduced the number of searches required for clinical EHR IR tasks compared to direct search term matching.
More Related Videos
09:20Cloud-Based Phrase Mining and Analysis of User-Defined Phrase-Category Association in Biomedical Publications
Published on: February 23, 2019
05:47Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR
Improving Translational Accuracy