Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2025
Surgical Angiogenesis in Porcine Tibial Allotransplantation: A New Large Animal Bone Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation Model
Published on: August 13, 2017
Vascularized and Non-vascularized Fibula Grafts in Tumour Reconstruction: Single Centre Experience With Mid to
Sabina M Gorski1,2, Chao Dong1,3, Ulrich Lenze1
1Paediatric Orthopaedic Department, University Children's Hospital (UKBB), Basel, Switzerland.
Background/Aim:
Vascularized (VFG) and non-vascularized fibula grafts (NVFG) are used in reconstruction of bone defects after tumour resection. This study compared both autografts and their results, risk factors, and complications.
Patients And Methods:
Tumour resection and reconstruction by using VFG (n=17) and NVFG (n=36) were performed in 53 patients at our institute (range=3-65 years of age, mean: 21.2 ± 13.2 years) of which 24 were female. Malignant tumours were diagnosed in 26 patients (VFG=16 patients-94%). The mean follow-up was 14.9 years (range=1.5-43 years). Factors like consolidation, functional and oncologic outcomes, and complications were analysed.
Results:
In total, 75 struts of fibula were obtained. The mean length of the fibula was 16.3 cm (16 in NVFG and 16.5 in VFG). The mean union time was 13 months (6 to 25 months) overall. Hypertrophy was found in 65 of 75 grafts (86.7%) and consolidation was found in 69 (92%). Hypertrophy was similar in VFG (85.3%) and NVFG (87.1%). Complication rate in VFG was 41% and in NVFG 25%. Fractures were found in 7 (13%), infections in 4 (7.5%), and non-union in 5 (9.4%) patients. Chemotherapy was the only negative prognostic factor for union time (p=0.021).
Conclusion:
Both VFG and NVFG are used with successful results in the reconstruction of segmental bone tumour defects. With lower complication rates, NVFG showed comparable results to VFG but is limited in indication by size for greater defects, and malignant tumours. Chemotherapy is an adverse factor leading to prolonged union time in both techniques.
