Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2025
Substantiating Appropriate Motion Capture Techniques for the Assessment of Nordic Walking Gait and Posture in Older Adults
Published on: May 12, 2016
[Guidelines: leash or walking stick?]
Abel Thijs1,2, Wim Opstelten3
1Amsterdam UMC, locatie VUmc, afd. Interne Geneeskunde, Amsterdam.
Insights
Clinical practice guidelines offer valuable support but present challenges. Physicians must critically evaluate recommendations, especially with multiple conditions, to ensure optimal patient care.
Area of Science:
- Medical Practice
- Clinical Decision-Making
Context:
- Physicians face numerous clinical practice guidelines.
- Assessing the evidence base for recommendations can be challenging.
- Conflicting recommendations arise, particularly in multimorbidity cases.
Purpose:
- To highlight the benefits and drawbacks of clinical practice guidelines.
- To emphasize the need for critical appraisal of guideline recommendations.
- To advocate for a balanced approach to guideline implementation in patient care.
Summary:
- Guidelines are valuable tools but have limitations, including volume, clarity of evidence, and potential conflicts.
- Challenges include restricted physician autonomy and conflicting advice in complex cases.
- Guideline development is time-consuming and susceptible to conflicts of interest.
Impact:
- Promotes a nuanced understanding of guidelines as aids, not mandates.
- Encourages critical thinking and wise application of guidelines in medical education.
- Stresses the importance of regular evaluation and revision of guidelines for continued relevance and efficacy.
Abstract:
Guidelines are undeniably of great value to practicing physicians, but there are also objections. Due to the multitude of guidelines, it is sometimes difficult to find the most appropriate and it is not always clear how well-founded recommendations are. In addition, guidelines can limit the freedom of action. Also, in individual patients - especially in the case of multimorbidity - recommendations from different guidelines can conflict with each other. Finally, drawing up guidelines takes a lot of time, which is at the expense of patient care, and conflicts of interest are difficult to avoid completely. It is therefore important to put the recommendations from guidelines into perspective: they are an aid to individual patient care, not a law. This perspective is also important in education, so that students are taught to use guidelines in a wise way. Finally, it is important to regularly evaluate recommendations and revise them if necessary.
Related Concept Videos
01:28Survey Safety
01:06Legal Guidelines for Documentation
01:26Field Procedure for Staking Out Curves