[Deviating from guideline-recommended diagnostic work-up in general practice: examples involving high-sensitivity

Ralf E Harskamp1,2, Pier Woudstra3, Ramon R Gorter4

  • 1Amsterdam UMC, afd. Huisartsgeneeskunde, Amsterdam.

Insights

Clinical guidelines aid decision-making but aren't exhaustive. Deviating from diagnostic testing recommendations in primary care can lead to over- or under-testing, as illustrated by troponin and CRP testing scenarios.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Medicine
  • Diagnostic Testing
  • Evidence-Based Practice

Context:

  • Clinical guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations but have limitations.
  • Deviations from guidelines are common due to various factors (contextual, ethical, clinical, scientific).
  • Diagnostic work-up deviations can result in over- or under-testing.

Purpose:

  • To illustrate scenarios where deviating from diagnostic testing guidelines occurs in primary care.
  • To highlight potential consequences of non-adherence to clinical guidelines in diagnostic testing.
  • To discuss the nuances of applying clinical guidelines in real-world patient care.

Summary:

  • Discusses two primary care cases: high-sensitivity troponin testing for chest discomfort and CRP testing for pediatric abdominal pain.
  • Examines deviations from recommended diagnostic pathways in these specific clinical scenarios.
  • Highlights the balance between guideline adherence and individualized patient care.

Impact:

  • Provides practical insights for clinicians managing diagnostic testing in primary care.
  • Emphasizes the importance of considering patient-specific factors beyond guideline recommendations.
  • Contributes to the understanding of over- and under-testing in diagnostic work-ups.

Related Concept Videos