Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
[Conflicts of interest in scientific advisory panels]
Bart-Jan Kullberg1,2, Marianne Geleijnse3
1Gezondheidsraad, Den Haag; Radboudumc, Nijmegen.
Abstract:
Independence is crucial for the quality and credibility of scientific recommendations and guidelines. The composition of advisory committees requires a full understanding of the relationships and interests of prospective committee members. In addition to financial relationships, intellectual interests, professional interests, and reputation may also play a role. In addition to preventing conflicts of interest among committee members, precautions are also required during the review and authorisation stages of draft recommendations. We describe which potential or perceived conflicts of interests may occur, and how quality and independence of the advisory process can be safeguarded.
Related Concept Videos
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS): Interferences
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Ethics in Research
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

